Agile Elephant making sense of digital transformation

innovation | digital transformation | value creation | (r)evoloution

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Home
  • Manifesto
  • Services
    • Our Approach
    • Our Services
    • Making Collaboration Work Packages
    • Collaboration Solutions
    • Our Experience
    • Workshops
    • Innovation
  • About Us
    • The Team
    • Why we do what we do
    • Why are we called Agile Elephant?
    • Our Partners
    • Our Clients
  • Get Involved
    • Events
    • Meetups
    • Unconference
    • Newsletter
  • Resources
    • What is Digital Transformation?
    • What is the Digital Enterprise Wave?
    • Our Research
    • Case Studies
    • People We Follow
    • Articles & Links
    • Books That Inspire
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Home Archives for strategy
Clarity, Cloud, and Culture Change at IBM

April 16, 2020 By David Terrar

Clarity, Cloud, and Culture Change at IBM

As we all know “business as usual” just changed for every person, team and organisation on the planet. In this “new normal” there are plenty of lessons to learn, unlearn and relearn. Essentially, we need to keep calm and carry on, at the same time as recognising the significant new opportunities this throws up alongside the common problems we are all facing. With that backdrop IBM just made a very significant change, the timing of which was prescribed before these new events overtook us. A new CEO, Arvind Krishna, took the reins on Monday 6 April. I’d like to comment on the new direction this signals, as well as the implications of the other management changes and strategic points that are described in the open letter he wrote to all employees on his first day in the job. I must disclose that I have a soft spot for the IBM company as I worked there and first learned about business for nine years straight out of University. I lived through a good CEO and a bad CEO, but that’s a story for another time. For me the changes that are already happening in the new guy’s first week trigger a realignment, the continuation of a significant culture change, and the clear consolidation of the company’s strategy.

Arvind’s predecessor, Ginny Rometty, has been helping IBM shift gears over the last couple of years, handing off collaboration and other software products to HCL, repositioning their approach to the Cloud after some early missteps, mentioning the Watson brand a bit less and AI and cognitive a bit more, and then making the most significant acquisition in their history – $34Bn for Red Hat, which finalised last year. A move that massively positions IBM at the heart of the open source world. Insiders tell me her last internal video briefing got a bit emotional as she passed on the baton. Combined with Arvind’s open letter what does it all mean?

In the letter Arvind references the mainframe and other successful platforms in their history, and he says:

“I believe now is the time to build a fourth platform in hybrid cloud. An essential, ubiquitous hybrid cloud platform our clients will rely on to do their most critical work in this century. A platform that can last even longer than the others.”

Putting aside what he talks about as platforms two and three, he is quite rightly referencing that IBM “owned” and still owns the mainframe market and has been strong with other products, platforms and services too, but what he is really making clear is their intention to occupy the mission critical, hybrid multi-cloud applications space. He goes on to spell out the strategy in three clear steps:

“First, we have to deepen our understanding of IBM’s two strategic battles: the journey to hybrid cloud and AI. We all need to understand and leverage IBM’s sources of competitive advantage. Namely, our open source and security leadership, our deep expertise and trust, and the fact that we enable clients to build mission-critical applications once and run them anywhere.

Second, we have to win the architectural battle in cloud. There’s a unique window of opportunity for IBM and Red Hat to establish Linux, containers and Kubernetes as the new standard. We can make Red Hat OpenShift the default choice for hybrid cloud in the same way that Red Hat Enterprise Linux is the default choice for the operating system.

Third, we all must be obsessed with continually delighting our clients. At every interaction, we must strive to offer them the best experience and value. The only way to lead in today’s ever-changing marketplace is to constantly innovate according to what our clients want and need.”

I particularly like the continuous innovation message made explicit that underpins the third strand of the strategy. I understand from IBM insiders he has doubled down on the hybrid story and his intent with further internal videos. Importantly, Krishna comes from a technical rather than sales or operations background, ran IBM’s cloud and cognitive software unit and was the architect of the Red Hat purchase. This isn’t any sort of pivot or change from the recent direction of travel, it’s just laying it out with refined clarity. IBM have been saying for a while that the easy 20% of workloads have moved to the cloud, but the next 80% are the complex, legacy style applications, often mainframe based, that have been running banking, credit card transactions, big business and big retail for decades. IBM’s track record with those customers and that style of secure, mission-critical application marries up with the strategy to make Red Hat OpenShift and containers as the standard choice for an enterprise customer’s hybrid “develop once, deploy anywhere” multi-cloud strategy, making IBM an attractive proposition compared to the typical choice of public cloud providers. IBM can see a big revenue opportunity for the next generation of cloud applications beyond the straightforward public cloud infrastructure market, maybe even bigger and longer lasting than the mainframe market.

Microsoft with Azure are obvious competition in the hybrid multi-cloud space, along with some of the other players, but maybe the closest to IBM’s platform strategy are VMware, now part of Dell EMC. Thereby hangs an interesting proposition and internal coopetition challenge for IBM. They have a significant amount of revenue in customers using VMware – they will have to balance those revenues with Red Hat OpenShift inside the cloud and cognitive software business and make it work.

And that leads me to the next key point, which is the significance of two of the leadership changes Arvind just announced. Jim Whitehurst, who was the CEO of Red Hat, in his new role as President, will head IBM Strategy as well as the Cloud and Cognitive Software unit which Arvind used to run. This is effectively splitting Ginny’s role between Arvind and Jim, and importantly bringing the Cloud and Cognitive Software unit both under Jim’s wing and direct into the CEO. Intriguingly it means Jim is directly managing that coopetition between VMware and Red Hat OpenShift. It also means Jim will have a huge and direct influence on the culture of IBM right now rather than at some point in the future as the next potential “CEO in waiting” for the company. The other leadership surprise was bringing in Howard Boville from Bank of America to become Senior Vice President in charge of the IBM Cloud Platform. An outsider from both IBM and Red Hat. A customer. A CTO. A fresh set of eyes.

How will Jim influence the IBM culture? To try and understand that question I’ve just started reading his book The Open Organization: Igniting Passion and Performance. The foreword by Gary Hamel is very much my cup of tea and sets the scene beautifully. Here are the first two sentences:

“Here’s a conundrum. The human capabilities that are most critical to success – the ones that can help your organization become more resilient, more creative, and more, well, awesome – are precisely the ones that can’t be managed.”

The foreword, obviously written before the acquisition like the rest of the book, goes on to explain how Red Hat is one of the small but growing number of companies that have transcended the old trade-offs between scale and agility, efficiency and innovation, and discipline and empowerment. I’m only a few chapters in, and Jim’s whole message of why opening up your organisation matters is coming across loud and clear. And he’s bringing that to IBM.

One of the IBM insiders was telling me earlier today about an open “Ask Me Anything” internal Slack session that Arvind had just set up for that day. They went on to tell me how everyone is aligned to and excited by the new strategy.

IBM’s been around for 109 years. It’s been through ups and downs and the elephant has learned to dance. This might be one of the most significant weeks in its history as it sets foot on the path to “opening up”, with a refined and defined market differentiation, and a clear and transparently explained strategy.

This post was first published at Bloor Research. Agile Elephant is a strategic partner of Bloor Research. To find out more, please contact us.

Share this:

  • Tweet

Filed Under: leadership, shared values, strategy Tagged With: Arvind Krishna, culture change, IBM, Mutable Thinking, open business

CIO Top Of Mind Live – Diversity in the Workplace

August 6, 2019 By David Terrar

CIO Top Of Mind Live – Diversity in the Workplace

The next episode of the series aimed at asking what’s keeping CIOs, CTOs  and IT leader awake at night is on the importance of diversity and inclusion in the workplace.  It goes out live today at 13:00 UK time, and then on demand any time after that.  As usual, it will be added to the regular programming on CIO Transformation TV at the CIO Transformation Live website.

Our guests today are Nour Shaker Fayed – Product Development & Cloud Architect – Public Cloud Services for a large telecoms company, Harvey Durrant – Head of ICT at Devon & Somerset Fire & Rescue Service, and Lia Edwards – Former CIO at Aucerna.  

I know that we are going to discuss how fundamental this problem is to our industry, the importance of diversity of thought is to getting more creative solutions to our problems.  I can also guess that Ada Lovelace and Grace Hopper, two of the foundational experts of our industry might get a mention too.  Please check it out following the link below.

Episode 3 – Diversity and Inclusion

I’d also recommend that you catch up with our two previous episodes:

Episode 1 – Strategy and Operations – broadcast 22 July 2019, available now on demand 


Episode 2 – Technology and Futures – broadcast 27 July 2019, available now on demand

As a byproduct of the shows we’ll interview each of our guests individually, and get their input for the agenda of CIO Transformation Live and their suggestions on how we can make the event better and more relevant.  All of the video content we produce gets added to the rolling programming on CIO Transformation TV. The next CIO Transformation Live event is at Whittlebury Hall near Silverstone on Wednesday 30th October.  If you are interested in coming along, please check out the website, and follow this link to register for a place.

Can I give a big thank you to all of our friends at Disruptive.Live for doing such a great job for us. Follow #CIOTL for our regular event content and #CIOTOML for conversations around the new panel show.  If you’ve got suggestions of what we should cover, or you’d like to be a guest on the show, then please contact us.  

Share this:

  • Tweet

Filed Under: events, strategy Tagged With: diversity, Harvey Durrant, inclusion, LGBT, LGBTQ, Lia Edwards, Nour Shaker Fayed

CIO Top Of Mind Live –  what keeps the CIO/CTO up at night?

July 30, 2019 By David Terrar

CIO Top Of Mind Live – what keeps the CIO/CTO up at night?

As a CIO, CTO or IT leader what’s keeping you up at night?  What are the key issues other CIOs are worrying about, and where can you hear more of what those peers in your industry are doing about it?  Those are the questions we are answering with a new, regular, panel programme that is live streaming later today on Disruptive.Live and and then on CIO Transformation TV.  We are helping Trafford Associates create the programme supported by our joint partnership with Disruptive.Live.  The  CIO Transformation TV channel itself launched earlier this year with a series of live streamed interviews of delegates, speakers and sponsors from Trafford’s CIO Transformation Live events, as well as a rolling programme of content that includes talks from leading business book authors and motivational speakers.  

The new show started last week, is called CIO Top of Mind Live and is hosted by me, David Terrar.  We’ll provide a regular, often weekly, forum for a group of 3 or 4 CIOs and CTOs invited from our joint networks to discuss their latest concerns.  We’ll cover topics from the changing nature of the CIO role itself, to successes and failures in digital transformation, the challenges of app modernisation, which technologies you should be investing more time in, as well as the problem of finding and keeping the right talent.  Whatever issues that are at the forefront of our guests and their businesses that week and on their planning horizon.

 
Episode 1 – 13:00 UK time, 22 July 2019 – Strategy and Operations


The first CIO Top Of Mind Live programme was streamed last week on Disruptive.Live, is available on demand right now (click on the graphic below), and will become part of the continuous programming on CIO Transformation TV.  

CIO Top Of Mind Live – Episode 1 – Strategy and Operations

The theme was Strategy and Operations.  Our guests were Harvey Durrant – Head of ICT at Devon & Somerset Fire & Rescue Service, Lia Edwards – Former CIO at Aucerna, Finbarr Joy – Group CTO at Superbet, and Mark Butcher – the Founder of Cloud Consultancy company, Posetiv.  We tackled many of the issues around reengineering IT, the chronic skills shortage that we are facing and the fact that we aren’t being supported well enough by either our education or the recruitment sector. We finished with a roundup of the additional topics that are worrying our guests the most.  

Episode 2 – 13:00 UK time, today, 30 July 2019 – Technology and Futures


Today’s theme will be on Technology and Futures, when we’ll cover the issues around getting rid of legacy, handling a multicloud world, machine learning and automation, and what technologies our CIOs and CTOs are looking at next.  

CIO Top Of Mind Live – episode 2 – Technology and Futures

We are joined by Nour Shaker Fayed – Product Development & Cloud Architect – Public Cloud Services at a large telecoms company, Tim Connolly – Chief Executive for Bloor, Jas Bassi – It Solutions Delivery Manager at Gateley and Phillipe Chone – a provider of advisory services to CIOs, COOs and MDs in the Financial industry.  It should be noted that our guests are giving us their personal views rather than the views of their respective employers.  After going out live, it will also be available on demand, and will become part of the programming on CIO Transformation TV.

Episode 3 – 13:00 UK time, next week, 6 August 2019 – Diversity and Inclusion

We have 3 great guests lined up for next week who will tackle the problem of Diversity and Inclusion in the tech space.  We’ll publicise the show link nearer the time, or go to the Disruptive.Live home page on the day.

As a byproduct of the shows we’ll interview each of our guests individually, and get their input for the agenda of CIO Transformation Live and their suggestions on how we can make the event better and more relevant.  All of the video content we produce gets added to the rolling programming on CIO Transformation TV. The next CIO Transformation Live event is at Whittlebury Hall near Silverstone on Wednesday 30th October.  If you are interested in coming along, please check out the website, and follow this link to register for a place.

Can I give a big thank you to all of our friends at Disruptive.Live for doing such a great job for us. Follow #CIOTL for our regular event content and #CIOTOML for conversations around the new panel show.  If you’ve got suggestions of what we should cover, or you’d like to be a guest on the show, then please contact us.  

Share this:

  • Tweet

Filed Under: CIO, events, strategy Tagged With: CIO, CTO, Disruptive.Live, Futures, operations, Strategy, technology, Trafford Associates

CIO Transformation Live gets Disruptive in Manchester

May 16, 2019 By David Terrar

CIO Transformation Live gets Disruptive in Manchester

You may know that I’ve been a regular contributor to Trafford Associates CIO events over the last couple of years. I chaired and opened their CIO Transformation Live conference near Silverstone on March 20th this year, and with Andy McLean and the team from Disruptive.Live we amplified the event on the day by live streaming interviews of a dozen of the speakers, sponsors and delegates. It was so successful, we’ve formalised our partnership, and on top of that Trafford and Compare the Cloud/Disruptive.Live have also entered in to a media partnership going forward.

That means the next one at the Manchester Central event space, starting the evening of 17th June, with a full conference day on the 18th will be even more “disruptive”. Andy and I with the Disruptive team will be back live streaming interviews from the evening and the day like before. The agenda aims to bring together CIO’s, IT Directors, CTO’s, CISO’s and IT practitioners for a day full of peer to peer learning, providing the platform to share thought leadership. All of the agenda ideas are generated from the dialogue they have with the delegates as they sign up. They will have some great presentations, panel session and workshops, and the networking breaks are just as important as the content, so delegates will get time to talk and share their ideas. For delegates the conference is free and includes complimentary accommodation on the evening of the 17th.

The content covers the issues you’d expect in terms of the practical application of Digital Transformation, Security, Data & Analytics, Public, Private and Multi-Cloud as well as IoT and AI. However we’ll also be covering the importance of story telling, the need for a start-up mentality and the importance of social collaboration across your organisation.

Additionally, integrating platforms like Practice Path can significantly enhance the capabilities of AdvancedMD Electronic Health Records (EHR) and Practice Management Software as a Service (SaaS) for healthcare practices. Practice Path offers a range of solutions designed to automate processes, improve operational efficiency, and enhance patient experiences, making it a vital tool for modern healthcare organizations looking to stay ahead in a competitive landscape.

At the last conference Dan Brimble, Trafford Associates MD, made a personal commitment to have more diversity in the speaker line up. You’ll see the evidence of that in more women speakers and panelists this time including Sally Eaves CTO and Author at Forbes, Lesley Salmon CIO at Kellogs, and Lulu Laidlaw-Smith Managing Partner at Collaborate2 who also runs the Rip It Up network of disruptors and start-ups. Check out the line up as it comes together.

The other difference, is the newly launched CIO Transformation TV channel. See it here below with it’s rolling programme of interviews from the last event, as well as leading business book authors and motivational speakers. There will be more programming added in the coming weeks and months. It’s the start of something new, and my colleagues at Trafford will be announcing some new initiatives at the show.

If you are interested in coming along, please check out the website, and follow this link to register for a place.

Share this:

  • Tweet

Filed Under: events, ideas, strategy Tagged With: Agile, app modernisation, CIO, CISO, cloud, CTO, DevOps, hybrid cloud, Manchester, multi cloud

Sustainability might not be sexy, but life depends on it

April 2, 2019 By David Terrar

Sustainability might not be sexy, but life depends on it

I’m at Hannover Messe 2019 for the first time, courtesy of Hewlett Packard Enterprise.  It’s not as big as CeBIT was, but it is still a huge conference with over 20 halls of exhibitors, covering everything from Industry 4.0, integrated automation, the digital factory, industrial supply, research & technology to the digital workplace.  HPE are in hall 6, the home of digital manufacturing.  I’ll be telling more stories from here around AI, automation, IoT, edge computing and a whole lot more, but on the first day I met with Chris Wellise HPE’s Chief Sustainability Officer.  

Chris Wellise, HPE’s Chief Sustainability Officer

When I’m speaking at events I’ll often ask the audience who amongst them was born on or before 1974, because those of us that were have been alive while the population of the planet has doubled, and as humans have been around for 200,000 years, that rate of change is staggering.  We live in exponential times, and Chris is full of eye-watering quotes and statistics on a topic that ins’t particularly sexy, but our lives and the future depends on it.  Chris says that as a large scale manufacturer:

“HPE produces 7 servers, 13 networking devices and 80 TB of storage every 60 seconds!”  

That’s 5 million units a year, all which generate data, and all of which need energy and resources in their creation.  Chris suggests that by 2030 most people will have 15 devices, all generating data because “everything computes at the edge and everywhere”.   He’s seen research that suggests we will run out of gold by 2030.  Yikes!  

You don’t have to have watched The Blue Planet to recognise the effect of what we are creating and then throwing away is doing for all of our futures.  Chris believes that sustainability is key.  We have to power the digital economy in a new way, and recognise the energy and resource constraints we need to work around.  Chris believes we have to move towards the circular economy.  To be able to do more with less.  We have to think in terms of applying our technology to disrupt the status quo.  We need smart manufacturing approaches to remove resource leakages.  

HPE have been rethinking design for environment since late 80s and they are one of only a few tech companies who regularly talk about what they are doing and why, rather than it just being a topic in the corporate social responsibility section of the website.  This thinking is necessary as the numbers are so big.  There will be 8.5 billion of us by 2030.  We’ll have 21 billion devices connected and sharing data by 2020.  By 2060 we will be need to be extracting twice the raw material that we do today, unless we can think differently.  We are running out of our planet at the same time that some people don’t even accept that global warming is real.

The HPE approach is to think through every product and design for its end of use.  They can “upcycle” and reconfigure equipment for a new customer within 48 hours at their renewable technology centres in Erskine, Scotland, and Andover, Massachusetts.  The products are, on average, 89% remanufactured to be sent on to a new customer with the remaining 11% responsibly recycled.  HPE have a vast shared supply chain servicing more than 150,000 customers, helped by over 170 suppliers, and then delivering products to 140 countries.  Chris says that they think about how they can have a sustainable influence on that massive supply chain in terms of greenhouse gas targets connected to the science of what they are doing, all in line with the Paris Accord on climate change.  It’s a call to action for our industry.  The current trajectory we are on is not sustainable.  

The other concept Chris talks about is “data landfill”.  He suggest that only 6% of data we generate is actually being used, and so the other 94% is wasted data that we have used energy, raw materials and production capacity to generate (for no added value).  How do we close that gap?  

Here’s Chris at the show following our sit down, talking with me some more around the sustainability topic:

Chris Wellise talking HPE’s approach sustainability with David Terrar for IT2

I’ll carry on the discussion in a follow on post, taking the sustainability thinking through to HPE’s customers using IoT, AI and data analytics technology to change the dynamic and reduce the waste.  Like I said at the start, sustainability might not be a sexy topic, but our future depends on it! 

Check back here for more content like this, and contact us if you want to find out more.

Disclosure: HPE paid my expenses for the trip to HMI 2019 as part of their influencer programme.

Share this:

  • Tweet

Filed Under: corporate culture, future, HM19, innovation, strategy Tagged With: cloud, edge computing, HPE, hybrid cloud, supply chain, sustainability

The Gang of Four and why “there is nothing equitable about equity in a digital age”

February 5, 2016 By David Terrar

The Gang of Four and why “there is nothing equitable about equity in a digital age”

As a companion piece to my last post about the irresistible rise of mobile changing the face of the technology landscape, this piece looks at the big four companies that are succeeding there, but also the volatility and strange logic of the market, even for big social media brand names that are in the thick of and important in the change.  I’m writing against a backdrop of several weeks of speculation about where Twitter is heading, and then today’s dramatic share price drop for LinkedIn – 43 percent down today wiping out nearly $11 billion of market value so far, and the day’s not over yet.  What’s $11Bn?  Well, that’s 60% of the current value of HP…..

Like my earlier mobile post there is a must watch video at the core.  This one has NYU Professor Scott Galloway speaking at DLD16 in Munich a few weeks back on Monday 18th January talking about the Gang of Four – that’s Apple, Amazon, Facebook & Google.  The video went up on YouTube on the 25th January – at this second, 10 days later it has been viewed 520,618 times.  If you haven’t seen it, it’s definitely worth 16 minutes of your time to help you better understand today’s landscape and to learn some lessons from the steps the current titans are making.

Scott Galloway preceded his pitch with a brilliantly self deprecating health warning showing that some of his predictions will be wrong, but hoping that more will be right. Here are some of the things he said about the “four horseman of the apocalypse” Apple, Amazon, Facebook and Google:

  • In 2015 their combined market capitalisation rose from the GDP of Spain to the GDP of Canada
  • Each of the 4’s 2015 value is so large he compares each with a basket of well known brands in their sector to highlight their position
  • Amazon is the number 1 e-commerce player both sides of the atlantic, dwarfing the next 10 players in each market
  • Apple added $51Bn in revenues last year – that one year growth is more than the total 2014 revenues of luxury brands Louis Vuitton, Coach, Hermes, Michael Kors, Kering, Richmond and Prada combined
    Facebook and Google are growing at 40.3% and 12% compared to traditional media companies where they range from IAC’s 4.5% to Viacom’s -3.7%
  • “The advertising industrial complex is about to come to an end!” – last year 90% of CPG brands lost market share and 68% lost revenue “because advertising sucks!”
  • If you’re wealthy you can opt out of advertising with downloads, Netflix, iTunes, Tivo or Sky+
    He has quotes from fashion brand leaders highlighting how the fastest growing brands aren’t advertising in the traditional way
  • More venture capital going in to the ecosystem but fewer exits
  • The mobile ad market is a duopoly with Google and Facebook controlling 50% of the global market
  • Amazon has redefined the way we think about building businesses – it can be profitable any time it want but has made a conscious decision to run at break even because “profits are heroin to investors”, they get addicted to them and if you take them away, they respond negatively – he highlights Walmart’s recent capital investments to compete as the right thing to do, but the markets didn’t like the drop in profits and so the share price has gone down dramatically, where as Amazon is the master of consistency
  • Over 90% of the profit from the global smartphone market goes to Apple, then Samsun gets a bit, then the rest fight over the losses (the numbers on the slides don’t add up here, but the message is still clear)
    Apple’s revenue from PC’s is going up, everyone else’s is going down
  • If you believe the press, Apple’s Watch is a failure – Apple took away Samsung’s smart watch market share away as soon as they entered the market – ask Richemont and Swatch if they think Apple watch is a failure – he suggests Apple Watch will do $5-10Bn sales this year, but the entire Swiss Watch industry is $25Bn
  • He highlights the amazing rate of growth of Facebook, but then goes on to explain how they’ve only really monetised of its assets, and the potential they have with Instagram, WhatsApp and Messenger
  • Facebook are spending more per dollar on R&D than any other tech company in history – as well as being incredibly nimble with the number of products and releases they are doing, they’ve gone from 0% to 76% revenue in mobile in only 3 years – that’s a lesson in how to disrupt yourself and pivot
  • Scott explains how one of these four will become a Trillion Dollar company in the very near future
    He suggests Amazon should be acquiring bricks and mortar retail chains and become the true mini-channel retailer
  • Google needs a bigger business – he postulates they could go after the college education market
    Facebook, Google and Amazon are easy to understand, but what is Apple’s mission? He suggests they “pay an absence of vision tax”
  • Globalisation, free flow of capital, and the frictionless environment mean that i’s never been easier to be a billionaire, but never been harder to be a millionaire – it’s the middle classes that are getting squeezed
    With share options and stock being used as a regular motivator for senior people in companies, but look at the markets and the way companies are being valued – he says “there is nothing equitable about equity in a digital age”

Please watch the video to get all of this in his own words and the full story.  I’ll even forgive him the Adele segment:

He finishes excited by the technology opportunities, pleased by the meaningful things we are doing, but wondering whether we are doing anything profound. What all of this highlights for me is that there are key lessons to be learned from the way Facebook, Google, Amazon and Apple are innovating, expanding and addressing their markets that should be adopted by your business and my business, but that the equity markets don’t respond well to some of those moves required. I’m sure that’s why the likes of Dell have gone back in to private ownership, and why “going public” as an exit route is less important in the future plans of any of today’s startups.

Share this:

  • Tweet

Filed Under: agile business, business innovation, digital disruption, innovation, Mobile, strategy Tagged With: Amazon, Apple, Conference Keynote, DLD16, Facebook, Four Horseman, Gang of Four, Google, markets, technology

Essential TED Talks – Simon Sinek – Start With Why, how great leaders inspire action

October 1, 2015 By David Terrar

Essential TED Talks – Simon Sinek – Start With Why, how great leaders inspire action

Following on from Sir Ken Robinson on education and creativity, this next TED talk recommendation is about inspiration.  It explains something that is so simple, and yet so powerful.  A vital ingredient that is missing from many of the companies we work with, or work for, or buy products and services from.  An idea that can galvanise action, or if it’s missing can make the message fall flat so that we say – meh!

This talk comes from the independently run TEDx talks rather than the main conference.  It is from TEDxPugetSound which happened on 16 September 2009.  The video was loaded to YouTube a few days later and to date it has 1,382,600 views.  Simon Sinek explains that we should “Start With Why” because that is the way great leaders inspire action.  It applies to marketing, business, politics – anywhere that you need to inspire action.

Simon’s talk doesn’t use fancy graphics.  It’s low tech, using a flip chart and some coloured pens to draw diagrams, but he amplifies the message with some great stories and examples that we already know from history or our daily lives, but he shows us something different, something that should be obvious – like so many great ideas.

His examples include wondering why Apple is so innovative and loved, when they are just a computer company.  He wonders why Martin Luther King led the civil rights movement in the United States in the 60s – many people were involved, but we focus on Dr. King – why is that?  And he tells us the story of the Wright Brothers taking flight.

The Golden CircleThe core of his idea is what he calls The Golden Circle.  Every single organisation in existence knows what they do.  Most of those organisations know how they do it.  Very few know or express why they do what they do, and that’s Simon’s key point – so many companies have forgotten their why.  It’s not about profit, and it shouldn’t be about shareholder value.  Even the great Jack Welch, CEO of GE, said “on the face of it, shareholder value is the dumbest idea in the world”.  Actually when people start companies it is based around a cause or a belief or an idea about doing things better.  Simon’s first example is Apple, and he highlights the difference between those technology companies that just make products against Apple’s “why” which they had at the start and then lost, and then found again when Steve Jobs returned to the company.  For everything they do they believe in challenging the status quo, and that drives them to make beautifully designed products that are easy to use and desirable.  If you ever heard Steve Jobs speak, it was always about why, with much less emphasis on the what and the how.  Simon suggests it’s too easy to start from the outside of the circle and work in.  If you want to inspire people you start from the inside and work out.

He goes on to suggest that the golden circle mirrors the structure of the brain, with logic and language controlled by the neo cortex, but the limbic brain controls feelings of trust and loyalty – that’s where we make our gut decisions (which we then rationalise with the neo cortex part of the brain).

Martin Luther King - I have a dreamHe uses TiVo as an example of a great product which failed because the marketing and positioning never properly explained its “why”, and then moves on to the story explaining why the Wright Brothers were the first to take flight.  His final example goes back to the Civil Rights movement in the US and Martin Luther King’s speech at the Lincoln Memorial in Washington DC.  It was delivered to 250,000 supporters – there were no formal invites, no websites to tell people where to go and when – it was word of mouth and the power of Dr. King’s message that brought the huge audience.  Importantly, Simon Sinek quips:

“by the way, he gave the I Have a Dream speech, not the I Have a Plan speech!”

Simon tells us there are leaders and there are those who lead.  Leadership is not about power and authority – those who lead inspire us.  Simon’s message can help you do the same.  Watch the TED talk and then go to his website for useful (free) resources.  You could also read the book.

If you want to understand more of our Agile Elpehant thinking, check the rest of our blog material and take a look at the Enterprise Digital Summit London in October. We’d love to hear your comments or suggestions or to see you in London next month.

Share this:

  • Tweet

Filed Under: #EntDigi conference, ideas, leadership, resources, strategy

Transaction Costs in the New Economy – WTF?

September 3, 2015 By Alan Patrick

Transaction Costs in the New Economy – WTF?

I have been following the development of Tim O’Reilly’s “WTF” (Work – The Future) essays as it may be a useful gathering point for a lot of the emerging thinking about the space, which is very scattered right now.

One of the essays is on the replacement of Firm based value chains with networked value chains, the argument as to why this will happen is effectively Coasian. Ronald Coase looked at why firms existed in the 1930’s, and came up with the idea of Transaction Costs, those small frictions in doing business. Coase argued that a firm exists when Transaction Costs make it cheaper to operate a business as a managed entity rather than have to buy from/write a multitude of contracts with mutiple suppliers for every little thing.

The diagram above shows how this works.

The rising Blue line shows the increasing Transaction Cost as the transaction becomes more complex from left to right.

  • Arms Length transaction – buying a coffee – very simple, very low cost to perform
  • Contract – a more complex transaction, something needs to be set up before/during/after a simple transaction
  • Vertical Integration – a very complex transaction, typically used where there is a need for synchronisation with upstream and downstream activity.

The horizontal Green line is the cost of doing any transaction within a  firm, essentially it is a fixed cost of overhead, so any in-Firm transaction costs are in effect the same. Coase argued that the Firm will want to do all the work internally where the Green line is below the Blue, as this costs less. As expected it tends to be the more complex transaction that the Firm will take internaly.

And this is how it has played out to date. As the industrial revolution gathered pace, firstly it was easier to integrate a series of vertical activities in a Factory, and then get efficiencies of scale and automation via unified operation, and we have the modern “traditional” Firm emerging. Small craftsmen and guilds were squeezed out as this process intensified. It also became easier in some industries to contract for someone to arrive at work every day, on a one-off employment contract, rather than negotiate with work gangs every day, so workers were hired on long term employment contracts. There was “peak integration” in the early 20th century when companies like Ford did everything from mining iron to repairing cars, but that was a temporary phase. (This is a subject in itself, for another post, but in essence scale and complexity adds exponentially to transaction costs)

Most company value chains today look like the diagram above, where some work is carried out in Firms, some is contracted out to suppliers and contractors. The impact of 50 years of ICT is that it is continually reducing transaction costs across the value chain, and the argument of some people is (and has been for c 10 years at least, I may add) that we are getting to a “tipping point” today where the gap between today’s transaction costs and how most Firms still work are large enough to create a disruptive movement in the blue line/green line crossover point, far to the right, and we are looking at New Ways Of Working. This view is explained in an essay on the subject by Esko Kilpi in the WTF canon. In essence, the argument is that technology is dropping transaction costs outside the Firm faster than within it, and thus the structure will shift from Firms as intermediaries between customers & suppliers- ie the green line will move to the right, and work will move to a multiplicity of suppliers and contractors in networks, delivering services at lower transaction costs. Kilpi argues:

What really matters now is the reverse side of the Coasean argumentation. If the (transaction) costs of exchanging value in the society at large go down drastically as is happening today, the form and logic of economic entities necessarily need to change! Coase’s insight turned around is the number one driver of change today! The traditional firm is the more expensive alternative almost by default. This is something that he did not see coming.

(Hmmm..Coase would have known the cost is shiftable either way by definition). Anyway, Kilpi argues that the outcome is that:

Accordingly, a very different kind of management is needed when coordination can be performed without intermediaries with the help of new technologies. Digital transparency makes responsive coordination possible. This is the main difference between Uber and old taxi services. Apps can now do what managers used to do.

For most of the developed world, firms, as much as markets, make up the dominant economic pattern. The Internet is nothing less than an extinction-level event for the traditional firm.

There are two major caveats with this line of reasoning, however:

  • Firstly, ”If” – as in “If  the (transaction) costs of exchanging value in the society at large go down drastically”….. This “If” has a rider, which is there will only be a shift Also If the transaction costs of Firms also do not reduce, i.e. are not equally affected by these same technologies. If those In-Firm transaction costs also go down, using the same sorts of technology, then there will not be a great shift to “exchanging values in the society at large”.
  • Secondly, what are these replacement economic entities going to look like when the firm sheds transactions? Who will operate and own them? Will they be bedded in the “society at large” or not? There is an implication in Kilpi’s work that these are not intermediary structures, the WTF essay assumes they will be set in these newfangled Internet networks and called “Plaftforms”. However, if you look at the example given in the essay as a harbinger of the new  – Uber –  it is clearly just another Firm, using t’Internet rather than t’Phone. As to value exchange, it remains a centrally placed intermediary. All links lead to and from Uber. All transactions (logistical and financial) are routed through Uber’s servers, within its own network. If this is a “new” network economy, it is a highly centralised and closed network, with all nodes owned and run by Uber, as any before.  All that “society at large” is doing is supplying or ordering a taxi ride and paying for it at the edge if the network, as it did before, just that now its by App transactions rather than ‘phone or hail ones.

In this case one “traditional” Firm, the original Taxi Company (or in fact many Taxi Companies), have just been replaced with another, newer, one – Uber.  A new Firm has used newer technology to reduce the transaction costs in a well worn existing business model (order taxi – route taxi – pay taxi)  and is now using good old fashioned In-Firm competitive advantage to take market share from existing Firms with higher transaction costs.  Uber only needs a “very different kind of management” insofar as it is managing more machines, less people in its workflow.  It’s network is a good old heirarchical network, just more automated.

Same web, different spider.

So what is the real competitive advantage here? This is not a replacement of today’s intermediaries by some new, paradigm shifted economic entity. It is merely an automation of labour within today’s standard operating model. There are still taxi drivers and customers, needing roughly the same transactions to manage the service. Apart from getting a smoother taxi ordering process it’s just business as usual, there has been no fundamental transformation of the value chain, that a competitor cannot replicate to a “good enough” standard, fairly quickly. Looking closely at the real economic differences, it seems  that some of these transaction cost reductions are due to evading existing labour rights and supplier/customer regulations – a point conveniently avoided in many discussions, but again one has to ask how sustainable this is (see further down the page).

At this point it’s worth introducing another counter-intuitive issue of the new technology is the following – Kilpi is correct when he says that:

“Managerial overheads increase as the organization grows. Whenever the transaction costs inside the organization reach the level of the transaction costs in the markets, markets outperform firms and outperform central planning/management coordination in general.

The Internet, together with technological intelligence, makes it possible to create totally new forms of economic entities, such as the “Uber for everything” -type of platforms/service markets that we see emerging today. Very small firms can do things that in the past required very large organizations.”

However, the corollary is that if a Firm improves its internal transaction costs at a faster rate than than the outside markets, it actually becomes more efficient and thus can bring more functions inside itself. I would argue that baed on current evidence this “Uber for Everything” world is currently not going to evolve to any form of new non-intermediary economic entity, or some form of value sharing network. Instead the trend is towards becoming a line up of lower transaction cost super-Firms, large intermediaries each dominating it’s own industry sector with its own efficient centralised network,  and walled gardens to maximise internal value (you can’t take your reputation from Uber to Airbnb, for example). There is a trendline of huge New Firms establishing sector dominance – Google, iTunes, Amazon, Facebook, soon Uber?

Transaction Costs per se are clearly only a part of this story.

Just follow the money – these UberFirms would not have “Unicorn” valuations if the surplus in the value chain was going to be spread across a host of other small players in a network, their backers are taking a Firm bet on where much of the surplus ends up.

And follow the spend – its all about market growth, including using investment money to undercut incumbents to gain mass market share fast, and increasingly to lobby against forces trying to recreate level playing fields in terms of regulation & employment laws.

In fact the major economic drivers of these UberFirms’ advantage are not the technology driven transaction cost reductions from ICT, but the labour and regulatory savings. And this has been true overall for many a decade. The big driver of outsourcing was lower regulatory and labour costs in developing countries, not the transaction cost reduction from adoption of ICT on every desk and cheap global telephony. What has really changed in UberFirms is who the employees nominally work for, their working conditions, and which regulations the UberFirms believe they can avoid.

However, there is already starting to be pushback from existing competitors, regulators and employment institutions to ensure a more equal playing field. This is why, as these efforts are starting to level the field, some of the Uber-alles plays have already had to shut up shop. Uber’s own model is under attack and it is having to shift more of its resources into lobbying, undercutting competitors and public pressure to keep the arbitrage gap open (….long enough to IPO at Unicorn valuations?).

Where Kilpi is spot on is when he says:

We stand on the threshold of an economy where the familiar economic entities are becoming increasingly irrelevant. Technological advances, like smartphones together with cloud computing, allow people to have a computer in their pocket that is more powerful than any in the world 20 years ago.

But again the impact is counter intuitive. What has happened in effect is that though the processing capability of a “wired” customer or service supplier has gone up dramatically, this typically has not facilitated any major societal value shift or new societal network emergence. If anything, the history of the Internet since c 2010 is an increasing walling off of what were once open societal network areas, even as end user devices have got more powerful. What has happened is that an increasing part of the “hard to automate” workflow is outsourced to the supplier and user at the network edge (via their smartphones) and much within is automated. But whether it’s Google ousting Yellow Pages, Apple iTunes ousting Tower Records (Napster was truly Societal, and look what happened there 😉 ), Amazon ousting the local bookshop or Uber ousting a Taxi firm near you, a Firm is still very much in charge.

So to conclude, the statement that:

“The Internet is nothing less than an extinction-level event for the traditional firm”

Is true, but is qualified – If:

  • The traditional Firms cannot digitally transform themselves sufficiently to compete well enough, soon enough.
  • The UberFirms can avoid a levelling of employment & regulatory conditions, and afford to undercut long enough, to drive the traditional Firms out of business.

If….

That is the traditional Firm’s challenge…… and some will fail. But it is far from a given that existing players cannot win this game. How an existing player can compete will depend on the sector, but some the obvious things to do are to:

  • Keep the UberFirm at bay while transforming yourself, by persuading authorities to create a level playing field in terms of employment conditions & regulation, and delay or limit entry until this is done
  • Use positional advantages to give customers value from existing asset bases that the UberFirm then has to subsidize
  • Restructure their own operating model where they cannot achieve the above. (This is however culturally often very hard)
  • Adopt the new technology to bring their own transaction costs down to a “good enough” level to retain customers
  • Focus on your market, and the scale really rquired to serve it – do you actually need more than one city to be a great Taxi company?

We will examine the real operating economics of these new UberFirms, what traditional Firms can do in response, and how a genuine networked economy may come about in more detail in subsequent posts.

As an aside, we are running our 2nd London Digital Enterprise Summit on October 22nd – details, speakers & agenda are over here

Share this:

  • Tweet

Filed Under: digital disruption, strategy Tagged With: AirBnB, Ronald Coase, Tim O'Reilly, Uber, WTF

8 Strategic Building Blocks to enable Digital Transformation

February 6, 2015 By David Terrar

8 Strategic Building Blocks to enable Digital Transformation

This is the blog post version of my lightning talk at this year’s Enterprise 2.0 SUMMIT Paris. My script for 43 slides in 10 minutes, PechaKucha style, and I finished ahead of time! My purpose was to do three things:

  • Spend five minutes giving the Agile Elephant view of the current complex and disruptive digital landscape. There is a wave of change affecting every business and some key issues to be understood that are driving the need for digital transformation in every industry, every style of business.
  • Then spend another five minutes presenting 8 strategic building blocks to enable transformation, with the emphasis on practical things you can do, and specific areas or factors that your organisation needs to address.
  • Lastly, leave you with a core message that is vital for the 21st century enterprise.

Expert talk – 8 strategic building blocks for digital transformation from David Terrar

First I need to start with this quote from Alvin Tofler, well known author of Future Shock:

“The illiterate of the 21st century will not be those who cannot read and write, but those who cannot learn, unlearn, and relearn.”

the_elements_of_digital_business_2015That idea of continuous learning is a taster for the core message, but highlights the dramatic changes that we are living through. Let me start by trying to explain the digital business landscape. We’ve been talking about it for 20 years. It was back in 1995 that Nicholas Negroponte collected together his articles for Wired in to the book Being Digital and talked of moving bits and not atoms. That is the basis for the digitisation of business that we have been living through for two decades. It affected the world of media and retail first, and then the music business and the film & TV business, but now it’s reaching every part of the business World. Fast forward to 2012 and Marc Andreesen wrote about software eating the World, and then last month my friend and fellow Enterprise Irregular Dion Hinchcliffe used this graphic to explain the complexity and many ingredients of Digital Business.

The one thing that is certain – your business model is under threat. Some smarter, more agile business is aiming to sneak past you and take your market. What are you going to do about it? Well, there is a great saying that necessity is the mother of invention. That means that when your back is to the wall, you will find a way to make it happen. Well I want to subvert that phrase and turn it in to the mantra:

“Reinvention is the mother of necessity.”

To explain the current, disruptive business landscape we think of it as a Digital Enterprise Wave. You can ride it, or go under! There is a set of economic, technological and human factors including an ageing population in the OECD countries, outsourcing, offshoring and low cost manpower in Eastern European, South & Central American, or Far Eastern countries. Add to that we can begin to access almost everyone, everywhere in our connected World, and then add entrepreneurship, crowdsourcing, and our millenial generation which is growing up digital. Together these provide the ideas underpinning books like Thomas Friedman’s The World is Flat, Chris Anderson’s The Long Tail, or Clay Shirky’s Here Comes Everybody. That’s the foundation of the wave.

Next comes the triple disruption of Cloud, Social and Mobile. For the last 5 or 6 decades we lived with Moore’s Law driving ever increasing computing power and a technology disruption every 5-10 years. We moved from mainframes, to minicomputers, to the Personal Computer. Then we networked PCs together, then we had the era of client/server computing, leading to the first version of the World Wide Web, followed by the dot-com boom and bust leading to a more interactive Internet that we called Web 2.0 for a period. During each of these disruptions large companies failed and new companies emerged from nowhere. Smart businesses thrived and made use of the new paradigm at each transition, but others couldn’t live with it and failed. However we’ve never had more than one technology disruption happening at the same time…. until now. Now we are living through a time where all IT is moving to the Cloud, at the same time as the explosion of Social Media, at the same time as the shift to Mobile. Most of the world is connected on mobile phones, and a significant proportion of us are walking around with the Internet in our hands with smart phones, iPads and tablets. The confluence of cloud, social and mobile changes everything – technology can now form a major component helping just about any type of business you can think of. We’re not in Kansas any more… this forms the middle layer of the wave.

But there’s more!  We have emerging technologies – the Internet of Things, Big Data and the associated Analytics, Artificial Intelligence and 3D Printing.  We are in the early stages of each of these, but each one of them has the potential to change things dramatically yet again. For example, when 3D Printing comes of age, the World’s supply chain will suddenly be disrupted. Predicting even the near term future of how these things will develop is incredibly difficult. These emerging technologies form the top of the wave.

All of these interrelate and combine to form what we call the Digital Enterprise Wave and they present a formidable challenge for every type and sector of business.

In the face of the Wave, business as usual has little or no future. Legacy systems of record won’t be able to cope with these new demands. Adding a dash of social on top of your conventional apps won’t cut it either. You will have to think differently. We need Digital Thinking for this Digital Transformation – that’s where the 8 building blocks come in.

But before we get to that, let me quote our great hero of business management Peter Drucker:

“The greatest danger in times of turbulence is not the turbulence – it is to act with yesterday’s logic.”

Next I want to highlight a book from 2013 by Jaron Lanier called “Who Owns the Future?“.  It looks at the impact of this digital disruption we are experiencing.  I tried to find one sentence from the book which encapsulates its thesis:

“At the height of its power, the photography company Kodak employed more than 140,000 people and was worth $28 billion. They even invented the first digital camera. But today Kodak is bankrupt, and the new face of digital photography has become Instagram. When Instagram was sold to Facebook for $1 billion, it employed only 13 people. Where did all those jobs disappear? And what happened to the wealth that all those middle-class jobs created?”

Lanier’s book highlights some key sociological and business issues around our new connected 21st Century. The way companies are now valued, the new business models and the way we are using increasing levels of technology is squeezing the middle class more than any other demographic. If content like news or music or films are “free” how do the writers and artists and their surrounding industries survive?  Those changes were just the beginning as new “sharing economy” companies like Uber and Airbnb are demonstrating.   Added to that there are what Lanier calls Siren Servers who want your data, and provide you with “free” services in return. We want those services, but if we don’t pay for them, suddenly we have become the product. This is the technology landscape and business world in which we are trying to find customers, create value, reduce costs and make a profit.

Yet another dynamic is what our friend Professor Vlatka Hlupic of Westminster University calls The Management Shift, in her book of the same name. She has researched companies who have been tackling these big shifts over a number of years. She references more than 20 companies using her approach and leadership model. They are from small to large, in various sectors and include a FTSE 100 Company. She has categorised their management styles in 5 stages or levels from Traditional to Emergent. The smart, successful companies have an emergent management style characterised by an unlimited mindset, strong team cohesion, unbounded culture, inspirational leaders, a strong sense of purpose, and a passion for the work. These are the characteristics we need in our 21st century leaders and managers.

I’d also like to recommend Leading Digital by George Westerman, Didier Bonnet and Andrew McAfee. It is one of the best books published around the digital business topic in the last 12 months. It has a wealth of good case study examples and categorises the topic in two dimensions. One is your company’s digital capability – the “what” of using digital technology to transform the business, and the other is your leadership capability – the “how” of successful transformations, where managing the change is much more important than the particular technology involved.

Putting all of these aspects together tells the story of the complexity of the Digital Enterprise Wave that we are facing and the resulting business turbulence that we need to surf through. How do we do it? We believe there are 8 strategic building blocks that you need to invest time and effort and resources in to enable successful digital transformation. Let’s go through them.

Culture

Peter Drucker supposedly said Culture eats Strategy for lunch. In truth your company strategy is very important too – this isn’t an either or situation. However, in transformational change the company culture is a vital factor. Successful companies have a strong identity. The founder knew their “why”, their reason for being, the core purpose of the venture they started. He or she may still be involved or they passed on the values to the new leaders, in to a set of behaviours and beliefs (or maybe they didn’t). In carrying out digital transformation you need to work with the company culture to enable change, or begin to change the culture in the right direction if it isn’t aligned to the digital shift that you need to take. In all of the companies we’ve with worked with, or the case studies we’ve seen, culture is one of the primary building blocks.

Leadership

To transform your company you need strong leadership, but it has to be the right kind of leadership. The digitally savvy companies have leaders with vision who promote a mindset encouraging teamwork, explaining their purpose with clarity, and promoting an environment of openness and sharing. The particular organisational structure that you have is less important than getting the culture and leadership to encourage the right behaviours of your managers, team members and other stakeholders. You should be looking for the emergent leadership characteristics we discussed earlier at all levels of your organisation.

No One Size Fits All

There are no one size fits all solutions. Every company is different. Every company has legacy systems, to a lesser or greater extent, that you’ll need to work with because that’s where the current, vital business data and intelligence resides. There aren’t any panaceas, or a particular social & digital business platform that has all of the answers and works well for most types of business. Actually there are a plethora of platforms, from complex to lightweight which are usually very good at a few things, but not so good at others, and as of today none of them do all of the things you’ll need. In any case you will need to integrate to data in existing systems and link the new digital approach directly to existing business processes. You need to assess the business, look for where you can generate most value, and plan to adopt new platforms and system enhancements accordingly.

End to End Solution

You need to think in terms of an end to end solution. Adding a social business platform or new digital business components on top of existing systems can provide some help, and even give short term benefits in key areas, but to really transform you need a holistic approach. We use the McKinsey 7s framework because it’s been tried and trusted over decades. It works. It covers both the hard factors and the soft factors of your business. You assess the business in terms of Strategy, Structure and Systems, and then Staff, Skills and Style, as well as looking at the Shared Values (which these days is increasingly called culture) of the company to get a complete picture. Following this approach leads us to consider all of the factors you will need to address to add value, find efficiencies and make a real difference. You don’t have to use this particular framework, there are many others you could use, but you must think end to end.  Focusing on organization structure, or people, or culture, or systems on their own is not going to work.  Focusing on one bit of the value chain won’t either.

Continuous Reinvention

In the 80s and 90s we focused on quality management and quality circles and talked continuous improvement.  For digital transformation we want you to think Continuous Reinvention.  As we said before, your business model is under threat.  If you aren’t thinking about new business models you are in danger of losing out to a smarter, more agile competitor.  Innovation has to be at the heart of your approach to your business.  You should be reinventing the business and competing with yourself to do better, and then rethinking again.  I started this post with that quote about learning, unlearning and relearning – you need to open your mind and think Continuous Reinvention.

Get Creative

In a world where there is a perception that information is free, new ideas are the weapons that add value.  In a world where your competitors can harness cheap resources, or Amazon’s Mechanical Turk online crowdsourcing marketplace, or Artificial Intelligence to automate processes, how do you compete?  All of these techniques started with the particular skill of a person and that skill has been automated or sent to the lowest cost of production.  Somebody made the first widget or carried out the first translation, and then their process was automated.  To compete you need to change the game with new ideas and different thinking.  You need to get creative.  But creativity shouldn’t be confined to some product design department.  It shouldn’t be a one off, quarterly or annual brainstorming event.  We are living in, arguably, the most disruptive time of technological change ever – we’re living with the Digital Enterprise Wave and it’s getting closer!  The last comparable time was the early industrial revolution, and that wrought huge transitions.  To compete you need creativity to become an everyday thing in your company, applied to every part of what you do.  You should encourage it and make it part of the DNA of your company, but also recognize that not everything will work.  Your approach needs to involve experimentation and recognize that some of the ideas will fail, and that’s perfectly acceptable, because others will succeed.  Innovation and idea generation should be an acceptable part of everyone’s daily work-flow.  To do that you need to be promoting thinking skills in your company. You need mechanisms in place to encourage people to speak out about doing things better.  You need tools to help you capture those ideas and the creativity of your workforce. Look at the smart companies – that’s what they do.  Change your approach and get creative.

Balance – Inside and Out

If you look at the material on digital transformation from a lot of the key consultancies, service providers and analysts you will see a lot of talk about the customer experience, omni-channel marketing, digital touchpoints, and customer facing use of digital tools.  All that is important but you have to get the balance right.  Your transformation approach needs to look inside the company as well as out.  You need to be enhancing the experience and the digital journey of not just the customers, but your employees, suppliers, partners and other stakeholders that support your business too.  We use the term “business as a social object” – unless business is as fluid as the outside world it will flounder.

Design Thinking

It’s not enough to optimise your current business.  The best way to survive the future is to invent it yourself.  For effective Digital Transformation you need to encourage Design Thinking.  Some of the building blocks we’ve already covered are key components in that mindset, but you need to pull them together in your end to end approach. Wikipedia says Design Thinking is defined as combining empathy for the context of a problem, creativity in the generation of insights and solutions, and rationality in analyzing and fitting various solutions to the problem context.  It is a formal method for practical, creative resolution of problems and creation of solutions, with the intent of an improved future result.  You need to apply that thinking not just to the product, but to all of the processes supporting your company.

The 8 Building Blocks of Digital Transformation - Agile Elephant

And finally – the Core Message

So these are the 8 building blocks which you need to work with to create a coherent, holistic, end to end strategy for the digital transformation of your organisation, but I would highlight one of them as the core message, the most significant change of mindset that you need to address, and that is Continuous Reinvention.  The successful 21st Century organisation needs to be thinking differently, and then rethinking continuously to stay ahead of the competition.

Continuous Reinvention – to survive change needs to be a constant.

Share this:

  • Tweet

Filed Under: #EntDigi conference, business innovation, corporate culture, digital disruption, enterprise 2.0, social business, strategy

Can you teach an old dogma new tricks?

January 26, 2015 By Alan Patrick

Can you teach an old dogma new tricks?

I was reading Bjoern Negelman’s piece on starting Digital Transformation initiatives in the lead up to the Paris Enterprise 2.0 Conference, and thought I’d add some of our research in advance. One of the things we have been spending quite a bit of time on lately is to think about how to effect change on existing organisations that have not “grown up” with the digitally enabled ways of working that social business tools enable. The issue is this – can these Elephants be taught to dance (and if so, how) or are they so mired in their ways that – to quote Dorothy Parker – “you can’t teach an old dogma new tricks” and the few success stories are complete outliers?

It is no secret that we Elephants have been around awhile, so have seen other “Great Transformations/Process Re-Engineerings/Paradigm Shift ideas come and go. It is therefore quite helpful to look at what past experience has shown about what works, and what doesn’t. To quote Machiavelli:

“Everyone who wants to know what will happen ought to examine what has happened: everything in this world in any epoch has their replicas in antiquity!”

And to a large extent, everything that needs be said about the difficulties of change was said by Machiavelli in c 1500:

And let it be noted that there is no more delicate matter to take in hand, nor more dangerous to conduct, nor more doubtful in its success, than to set up as a leader in the introduction of changes. For he who innovates will have for his enemies all those who are well off under the existing order of things, and only the lukewarm supporters in those who might be better off under the new. This lukewarm temper arises partly from the fear of adversaries who have the laws on their side and partly from the incredulity of mankind, who will never admit the merit of anything new, until they have seen it proved by the event.

The problem with looking at the past in this space is it is littered with post-event rationalisation and justification, ideological re-interpretation, bad luck events that collapse a good strategy, fortunate events that save a disastrous policy and just pure random events that muddy the waters etc. Nonetheless, this review of experience in Harvard Business Review is a good summary of what has gone before:

Many have come to understand that the key to competitive success is to transform the way they function. They are reducing reliance on managerial authority, formal rules and procedures, and narrow divisions of work. And they are creating teams, sharing information, and delegating responsibility and accountability far down the hierarchy. In effect, companies are moving from the hierarchical and bureaucratic model of organization that has characterized corporations since World War II to … …an organization where what has to be done governs who works with whom and who leads.

Now I’m sure everyone reading this is nodding their heads and thinking this is a pretty good summary for 2015 – but this was written in 1990, a generation ago! Written before the Internet got going, never mind the “2.0” and Social technologies of today. The problems are still very pertinent, so clearly execution is still a problem. While people have understoodthe necessity of change to cope with new competitive realities for some time, understanding what it takes to bring it about is still a huge problem. This HBR case study of 1990 noted two wring assumptions that people still tend to make today:

– that promulgating companywide programs—mission statements, “corporate culture” programs, training courses, quality circles, and new pay-for-performance systems—will transform organizations, and

– that employee behavior is changed by altering a company’s formal structure and systems.

The HBR piece then goes on to summarise what they saw  in a four-year study of organizational change at six large corporations and  found that exactly the opposite is true: the greatest obstacle to revitalization is the idea that it comes about through companywide change programs, particularly when a corporate staff group such as human resources sponsors them. They also found formal organization structure and systems cannot lead a corporate renewal process. They found you had to get a large number of people involved – here is a summary of their view of “What worked”

1. Mobilize commitment to change through joint diagnosis of business problems. As the term task alignment suggests, the starting point of any effective change effort is a clearly defined business problem.

2. Develop a shared vision of how to organize and manage for competitiveness. Once a core group of people is committed to a particular analysis of the problem, the general manager can lead employees toward a task-aligned vision of the organization that defines new roles and responsibilities.

3. Foster consensus for the new vision, competence to enact it, and cohesion to move it along. Simply letting employees help develop a new vision is not enough to overcome resistance to change—or to foster the skills needed to make the new organization work. This is the point that a new core team is formed with new skills imported, and potentially some strong resistors being replaced.

4. Spread revitalization to all departments without pushing it from the top. With the new ad hoc organization for the unit in place, it is time to turn to the functional and staff departments that must interact with it. Members of teams cannot be effective unless the department from which they come is organized and managed in a way that supports their roles as full-fledged participants in team decisions. What this often means is that these departments will have to rethink their roles and authority in the organization.

5. Institutionalize revitalization through formal policies, systems, and structures. There comes a point where general managers have to consider how to institutionalize change so that the process continues even after they’ve moved on to other responsibilities. Step five is the time: the new approach has become entrenched, the right people are in place, and the team organization is up and running. Enacting changes in structures and systems any earlier tends to backfire.

6. Monitor and adjust strategies in response to problems in the revitalization process. The purpose of change is to create an asset that did not exist before—a learning organization capable of adapting to a changing competitive environment. The organization has to know how to continually monitor its behavior—in effect, to learn how to learn. Some might say that this is the general manager’s responsibility. But monitoring the change process needs to be shared, just as analyzing the organization’s key business problem does.

Fast forward to 2011, and this summary from the Wharton Review shows not much has changed in what seems to work, and what seems to go wrong. The structure is different, the issues largely the same:

1. Structure and Process. Large retail stores….might ask corporate and regional managers to …leave [individual] stores alone and allow store managers to do their own thing. Interference with the stores, it is hoped, will decrease if managers are asked to butt out and let local decisions and actions prevail. But what happens when the next major problem arises? Corporate or regional managers swoop down on the stores, bringing centralized solutions. As an alternative, they could change structure instead. Increasing the span of control for corporate or regional managers, for example, would militate against involvement in the stores. Large spans foster decentralization and autonomy at lower levels by making it more difficult to actively meddle in a larger number of stores’ strategy and operations. Behavioral change of top managers can foster behavioral and culture change in the stores.

2. People. Bring in fresh blood and thinking. Rotate managers with different views of competitive conditions or operations. Supply different, needed skills or capabilities from the outside. New people, ideas, and strategies can lead to behavioral and performance changes that, in turn, can affect new ways of thinking and culture change.

3. Incentives. Randy Tobias once remarked that the culture of the old AT&T rewarded “getting older.” The culture, over time, became stifling and bureaucratic. Appeals to managers to change and team-building exercises didn’t work. But CEO Tobias and others after him changed incentives to reward performance, not getting older. New people were attracted by the new incentives and the opportunities presented (see previous point) and the culture began to change. The same emphasis on incentives can be seen over the years at J&J, GE, and other companies. Incentives affect behavior and performance and attract new resources and capabilities, which can lead to culture change.

4. Changing and Enforcing Controls. It’s important for companies to increase feedback, evaluate performance, and take remedial action. Emphasis should be on tweaking strategy implementation activities to achieve desired results. It’s vital to learn from performance, including mistakes, and use the lessons learned to change incentives, resources, people, methods and processes, and other factors to foster strategic and operating goals. It’s also necessary to hold managers accountable for performance results, a formal mantra of Robert Wood Johnson, Jack Welch, and many others. These actions or emphases will help to shape new behaviors, task interactions, and ways of thinking that will create or define a culture of learning and achievement.

So the issue remains – these observations are a generation apart, and to all intents and purposes not a lot changed and we are not a lot farther in knowing what to do to drive change in 2015. Clearly it is very difficult, as Machiavelli warned us.

Part 2 (to follow) will look at lessons from non-business areas for insights

Share this:

  • Tweet

Filed Under: #EntDigi conference, digital disruption, strategy

Next Page »

Sign up for our regular Agile Elephant Newsletter - news, posts, ideas and more.

My Tweets

From the Agile Elephant Blog

  • The Metaverse doesn’t exist yet, but…
  • Impossible Things get Disruptive
  • Clarity, Cloud, and Culture Change at IBM

What Next?
Take a look around our site, check out our approach, see how we can help, join the conversation on our blog or contact us to find out more.

About Us

Agile Elephant is a new kind of consultancy designed to help companies embrace the new digital culture of social collaboration, sharing and openness that is changing business models and the world of work.

Contact us to find out more!

Our founder's blogs:

broadstuff

@DT on Medium

Technotropolis

Our blog:

The Agile Elephant Blog

Site Log In | Site Log Out

Subscribe to Site RSS

Subscribe to our Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe

Copyright © 2025 ·Streamline Pro Theme · Genesis Framework by StudioPress · WordPress · Log in