Agile Elephant making sense of digital transformation

innovation | digital transformation | value creation | (r)evoloution

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Home
  • Manifesto
  • Services
    • Our Approach
    • Our Services
    • Making Collaboration Work Packages
    • Collaboration Solutions
    • Our Experience
    • Workshops
    • Innovation
  • About Us
    • The Team
    • Why we do what we do
    • Why are we called Agile Elephant?
    • Our Partners
    • Our Clients
  • Get Involved
    • Events
    • Meetups
    • Unconference
    • Newsletter
  • Resources
    • What is Digital Transformation?
    • What is the Digital Enterprise Wave?
    • Our Research
    • Case Studies
    • People We Follow
    • Articles & Links
    • Books That Inspire
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Home Archives for digital disruption
#GLH2020 launches the GLH Inclusivity Challenge

February 12, 2020 By David Terrar

#GLH2020 launches the GLH Inclusivity Challenge

We just yesterday blogged the details and opened registration for the London edition of this year’s Global Legal Hackathon, which might be the largest hackathon ever!  To add to an already great event, The Global Legal Hackathon have just a short while ago announced a worldwide collaboration with with She Breaks the Law, RSG Consulting, and global law firm BCLP to launch the GLH Inclusivity Challenge and you’ll know inclusivity, diversity and LGBTQ issues are always high on our agenda.  In any case the GLH weekend coincides with International Women’s Day (March 8), so the idea is a natural fit!

GLH2020 adds the GLH Inclusivity Challenge

The 2020 Global Legal Hackathon will be held between March 6-8 simultaneously in more than 50 cities and 25 countries around the world.  This year is the third year Agile Elephant has co-hosted London with our friends at Cambridge Strategy Group, and our the second year that the venue is kindly provided by the University of Westminster, although this year we are moving to a bigger space at their Marylebone Campus.  

As we’ve described, our goal is to get legal brains, marketers, business analysts and coders in to teams over a weekend creating apps and services that improve the practice and business of law, or provide better access to law for the public.  We’ll be fuelling their creativity with beer and pizza, although other food and beverages (including wine) will be available too, thanks to our sponsors – this is a not for profit exercise, and free to enter for all participants (so somebody has to cover our costs please!).  But this year, the Global organisers are setting this extra challenge:

“Participants and teams around the world, in every Global Legal Hackathon city, are challenged to invent new ways to increase equity, diversity, and inclusion in the legal industry.”

At the conclusion of GLH weekend, a local winner of the GLH Inclusivity Challenge will be selected by each city alongside the main winner, and will progress to a global semi-finals too. This will be an extra stream and, like the main stream, finalists will be invited to the GLH Finals & Gala, to be held in London in mid-May. On top of that, the overall winner of the GLH Inclusivity Challenge will be invited to present its solution during a diversity and inclusion summit that BCLP is planning to host in September, where leading figures from the industry will be asked to commit to ensuring the idea is brought to life and scaled up to deliver a lasting impact on the legal industry as a whole.

Kearra Markowich, Executive Director of the Global Legal Hackathon, and who is based here in London told us:

“the Global Legal Hackathon is remarkable for the fact that it is a global technology event that is majority women-led around the world.  Women lead the event in Brazil, Israel, Romania, Singapore, the United States, and many other countries. On the occasion of International Women’s Day overlapping with the Global Legal Hackathon, we are thrilled to be joined by women-owned RSG Consulting, She Breaks the Law, and the diversity and inclusion team of BCLP to challenge the world to invent new and novel approaches to increasing equity, diversity, and inclusion in the legal industry.”


We think this is a fantastic addition to what is always a great fun weekend. Follow these links to find out more about:

  • The Inclusivity Challenge
  • The London Edition of GLH2020
  • How to register

We look forward to seeing you in Marylebone!

Share this:

  • Tweet

Filed Under: #GLH2020, artificial intelligence & robotics, blockchain, business innovation, cloud, collaboration, creativity, digital disruption, emerging technologies, ideas, innovation, IoT Tagged With: diversity, Equal Pay, Equal Rights, Equality, Gender, inclusivity, International Women's Day, LGBTQ, women in tech

Is Blockchain relevant for any Business Model?

August 13, 2018 By David Terrar

Is Blockchain relevant for any Business Model?

We’ve been thinking and talking Blockchain here, trying to pull the reality out from the hype since 2015. Recently I heard a respected colleague suggest that it’s applicable in “less than 1/10 of 1% of corporate processes”. At the other end of the scale it’s going to take over the world. So what’s the reality of blockchain’s relevance to any business model and why? I was recently asked to think about exactly that question as input for a book chapter (that didn’t quite happen), and my brain jumped to both the history of trade, the power dynamics involved and the context. This (chapter length, 20 minute read) article is the result. So let’s get down to business, but let’s go back to where business began in our human history, and think this question through from first principles.

TRADE

Trade. Commerce. We have been exchanging value with goods and services as long as there have been humans. How have the components of trade developed over time, what’s new, and how can blockchain add anything to what we now call the business model? The relevance lies in the basic components of trade and commerce, the ways they have changed, and in turn changed our society over time. In our history new technologies have triggered industrial revolutions, globalisation, and the sheer numbers at play underpin today’s amazing rate of change that informs all business. We live in exponential times.

Look at a timeline of the way trade and commerce have developed since the beginning. Modern humans have been around on the planet for 200,000 years. The start of human civilisation had to wait for the end of the Ice Age 15,000 years ago, and the process really began with the development of agriculture in Turkey around 10,000 years ago. Instead of everyone needing to be hunters or gatherers to find food, we cultivated our own crops and livestock, and that led to food surpluses and the possibility of new roles in our tribes and societies. Some of us could specialise in producing the food, while others could be soldiers, artisans, artists, builders, administrators, priests or priestesses. Urbanisation and the first evidence our archaeologists can find of organised civilisations date from 9000-6000 BC. That is when we see the first evidence of the bazaar, which comes from the Persian word bāzār. Trade began in these marketplaces that started at the edge of our villages, towns and cities, but soon moved to the centre of things. Over time these bazaars formed a network of trading centres to exchange food, goods and information, and those evolved in to our major trading routes.

Initially to trade with each other we developed the system of barter. Introduced by Mesopotamia tribes, adopted by the Phoenicians it spread across the world with trade itself. We exchanged goods and services for other services and goods in return. We traded in food, tea, spices, silks, animal skins, furs and weapons. Valuable commodities like salt or gold were used like currency. Actual currency came in to existence around 600BC when King Alyattes minted the first coins in Lydia, now part of Turkey.

The Silk Road started around 200BC. The most famous and extensive, ancient network of trade routes that connected the East and West through the Middle East and Southern Europe bringing silk and other goods, but also religion, philosophies, culture, ideas and even disease too. By the time of the Roman Empire lenders based in temples made loans, accepted deposits and performed the exchange of money. With the difficulties of financing long-distance trade along these routes, the Hawala system started around the 8th century between Arabic and Muslim traders as a protection against theft. It is a popular and informal value transfer system based not on the movement of currency, but instead on the performance and honour of a huge network of money brokers. The word in Arabic means transfer, or sometimes trust and that’s significant.

Later, Marco Polo travelled this Silk Road from Europe to China and around 1290 he brought back the concept of paper money to Europeans, but it took until 1661 for the first bank notes to be printed in the west in Sweden.

BANKING AND ACCOUNTING FOR TRADE

When it comes to the concept of banking itself, that really started with merchants loaning grain and produce to farmers and traders. That process developed in to what we now know as banking in Italy in the Renaissance in Florence, Venice and Genoa. The Medici bank was established by Giovanni Medici in 1397, and the oldest bank still in existence is Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena which has been operating continuously since 1472.

We also have the Renaissance to thank for the financial bookkeeping practices we still use today. In the 15th Century Luca Pacioli, a friend of Leonardo da Vinci who was also a monk, a mathematician, and an alchemist formally codified the Italian double-entry accounting system known as the Method of the Merchants of Venice. It was the first system that allowed merchants to measure the worth of their business. Pacioli adapted Arabic mathematics to provide a system that could work across all trades and nations. Banking and accounting allowed capitalism to flourish and spread throughout Europe with major centres in Amsterdam and London, and through our trade routes to New York and the rest of the World.

We entered a period great changes. From the Renaissance to the Enlightenment. From the printing press to the first Industrial Revolution. From trade driven colonisation to the globalisation of the world economy that has been happening progressively since that time in the 15th century. All of this fuelled by new technologies and new forms of communication.

GLOBALISATION AND FOUR INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTIONS

The United States had been one of colonies, but by the end of the 19th century it was transforming to become a world power. In 1871 Western Union introduced the first money transfer service, based on its extensive telegraph network. As telecommunications developed in the 20th Century that led to another huge expansion in the banking sector. It accelerated business and markets towards a much more Internationally integrated economy. The first credit card was launched in 1946. Computers and the information technology they support have been developing rapidly since the 50s and 60s to the internet and the world wide web of the 90s. We started talking e-commerce, businesses began to need a website as well as bricks and mortar, and a significant portion of our buying and selling, both business and personal, went online. We’ve been regularly talking about digital since Nicholas Negroponte’s book Being Digital was published in 1995. The World Economic Forum tells us that we are the midst of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. The First Industrial Revolution starting around 1750 using water and steam power to mechanize production. The Second used electric power to create mass production. The Third used electronics and information technology to automate production. The Fourth we are experiencing today is characterised by a fusion of technologies across the physical, the digital and the biological. Every business is considering digitisation, digital transformation, and the way they connect with their customers, partners and suppliers. The businesses that want to survive are looking long and hard at their current business model and considering change before their competitors try and out flank them.

European banks began offering mobile phone banking in 1999, and our debit and credit cards went contactless first in the UK in 2008. During the first two decades of this century, cell phone technology, WiFi, 4G and cloud computing have advanced so that almost anyone in the developed world can afford a smart phone with “always-on” connections that allow us access to apps, maps, the web and social media. In return those devices are helping business track us and our buying behaviours so that we live more interconnected lives than ever. The first purely digital cryptocurrency appeared in 2009, and its underlying technology of blockchain, that is the subject of this post, is moving out of early adopter status to change things again, and dramatically. On top of all of this the rise of the Internet of Things (IoT) means a proliferation of connected devices, autonomous objects and appliances that do our bidding that are all reshaping life as we know it.

BUT WAIT, THERE’S MORE

It took 200,000 years for the World population to reach 1 billion, a milestone we passed in 1804. In 1974 we hit 4 billion. For those of us reading this article born on or before 1974, the population of the world has doubled in our lifetimes as we now approach 8 billion humans on the planet, growing at a rate of 200,000 more each day. Along with the amazing and accelerating advances in technology of the last 50 years, that means more of everything. More ideas. More creativity. More products in more categories. More choice. More competition. More transactions. More mouths to feed and more challenges.

So the exponential times we live in are driving the rate of change even faster. The statistics are staggering. We’ve discussed how trade has moved from barter to use of currencies, with banks and merchants getting involved, although barter is still valid. Our physical marketplaces have connected in to trade routes, evolved, gone global and been supplemented by telecommunications and the online world. What are the other ingredients of trade that we should consider, and how have the power dynamics changed over time?

BALANCING TRUST AND RISK

Back at the bazaar when we are bartering our goods or services, how trustworthy is the person we are trading with? Does that person have any certification or proof that they are legitimately who they are supposed to be? Are the goods or services they are exchanging with us genuine or defective in some way? Are they the age and condition that has been represented to us? The goods may be genuine, but are they actually owned by the seller? Are there any guarantees or warranties if anything goes wrong. Is there some insurance we can buy, or some method we can deploy to assure our goods aren’t stolen? Does the marketplace itself offer us any protection? As buyer and seller we negotiate and eventually agree an exchange of value by handshake or some form of contract, but were the terms of our agreement fair? If currencies were involved was the exchange rate valid for these circumstances, and were those currencies real or counterfeit? How is the exchange between buyer and seller actually executed? Standing face to face in the marketplace we can see each other and exchange our goods or the currency simultaneously, but if there is some production process or a promise of delivery, who will oversee and guarantee the delivery and the payment? Then as products and services get ever more complicated, and as globalisation and communications get involved, all of these issues multiply and extend across the distances involved and each link in the chain of supply from buyer to seller across a network of the intermediary businesses that join the transaction.

The key elements in this trading landscape, from the bazaar to today’s complex, technology driven markets, have always been about balancing trust and risk. Those two are involved at every stage of the process. From the beginning of trade in the bazaar to the present day we have created instruments of trust to help reduce those risks. Each buyer and seller has begun to record their transactions or tracked their assets in their own ledgers or other record keeping systems. We have minted coins and paper money with steps against counterfeiters to certify at least one side of the value exchange. We started to use trusted third parties with their own centralised systems to oversee our business transactions and to become part of the chain. The banks and their banking systems have evolved to help trade, keep our money safe, and they add further instruments to help us like letters of credit. We involve brokers to connect us with sellers, lawyers to oversee our contracts, accountants to keep our books, track our records and other third parties including governments to set, certify and verify the standards and quality of the goods and services we exchange.

All of these parties and the measures they employ reduce risk, but they add costs and inefficiencies across the business network. Each of these intermediaries charge fees for their services. They add steps in to the process, and introduce the possibility of delays in executing agreements or getting things done. They add cost and time with the duplication of effort required to maintain numerous ledgers to keep track of the transactions. They also add additional vulnerabilities. What if a bank or any of the parties’ centralised systems were compromised by fraud, a cyberattack, some system failure or by a simple mistake? The whole business network could be compromised.

CLARIFYING THE BUSINESS MODEL

So what can we do differently with new technology like blockchain? Before we answer that question, let’s explore what we now call the business model. In their 2005 paper Clarifying Business Models: Origins, Present, and Future of the Concept by A. Ostenwalder, Y. Pigneur, and C.L. Tucci, they describe the business model’s place in the firm as the blueprint of how a company does business. It is the translation of strategic issues, such as strategic positioning and strategic goals into a conceptual model that explicitly states how the business functions. Ostenwalder and Pignuer went on to develop their ideas in to their excellent book Business Model Generation. That provides an approach to discussing the business model in 9 components – key partners, key activities, key resources, value propositions, customer relationships, channels, and customer segments, all underpinned by cost structure and revenue streams. Where on this canvas can blockchain be applied to add value, increase efficiency or reduce cost?

THE BLOCKCHAIN GOLD RUSH

Blockchain technology is in the process of moving from early adopter status towards mainstream use but unfortunately, we are in the midst of a “Gold Rush”. There is too much hype and not enough substance in some of the reporting around the topic. Some companies have managed to increase their valuations simply by adding blockchain in to their name!  Beyond today’s heat, or the backlash of bad press it’s likely to cause as some of the current projects and start-ups fail, there is real value to be found “in them thar hills”.  So what can blockchain really do in practice for trade and how is it disruptive?

WHAT IS IT?

A blockchain is a distributed (peer to peer or decentralised) ledger, implemented across many networked servers, consisting of a continuously growing list of records, called blocks, which are linked across the whole network and secured using cryptography. You can have an open network that anyone can join, or more usually in enterprise implementations, a group of partners join an agreed business network. In addition to the ledger, business rules and smart contracts that execute automatically in a transaction, based on one or more conditions, can be built into the platform.

Traditional database technology always has some central party or owner giving access and administration rights that we have to trust to use their ledger. A blockchain ledger has those rights distributed to every node or partner in the network equally. This allows several parties or even competitors to share a trusted digital ledger across the network of computers without the need for any central, controlling authority. A single version of the truth. The combination of the cryptography used to safeguard each block, in conjunction with the fact that each block addition is “witnessed” and instantly replicated across all the servers in the network means that, in practice, no single party has the power or resources to tamper with the records. The ledger becomes immutable.

A few words of caution that we’ve blogged about before. An open blockchain could have any number of servers that all need to replicate every added record simultaneously. That might soak up a lot of computing power and energy, as well as not allowing much of a transaction rate through that ledger. This is exactly why enterprise implementations of blockchain usually deploy a closed or permissioned group of partners in a particular business network. That’s the position today. We’re at an early stage which you could liken to the early days of the Internet and the World Wide Web, but more on that later.

WHAT DOES BLOCKCHAIN SOLVE?

The problem we are solving here is at the core of all trade – trust. Blockchain’s key advantage is that the buyer and seller, the other parties or competitors that are involved can trust the validity of the distributed ledger without the need for any intermediary like a bank or broker or lawyer or government being involved. No reputation required. It eliminates the need for the duplication of effort that always happens amongst the parties involved, and reduces the need for those intermediaries. It changes the backbone of business. This is why the banks and financial institutions have been amongst the first to make big investments in to understanding and developing this new technology. Blockchain has the power to significantly disrupt their core business model as the key intermediary and the central overseer of trade. This is why blockchain developer skills are at a premium.

It is important to note that while blockchains contain transaction data, they are not a complete replacement for the existing database technology, transaction processing or messaging systems that they will always sit alongside and connect to.  Blockchain and the Distributed Ledger concept adds something new.  Blockchains contains verified, immutable proof of transactions or the recording of assets with benefits that extend far beyond those of a traditional database.

WHAT CAN IT DO?

Blockchain means that business networks can be simplified. The end participants in a trade, the buyer and the seller, stay the same but the need for intermediaries can be removed or reduced. The underlying transactional system can change to be simpler, more efficient and more open as all parties can share the same transaction record in the same ledger, rather than having to maintain one of their own. A secure blockchain business network can provide:

  • Enhanced privacy so that only those parties with permission can access the ledger. Depending on the application permissions might be extended to auditors or regulators where appropriate.
  • Improved transparency and auditability as everyone in the business network is working from the same ledger which is a single source of the truth.
  • Increased operational efficiency by removing the traditional extra steps and intermediaries, and streamlining the transfer of the assets and value exchange.

Here are some examples of how blockchain technology is currently in action changing things:

  • In 2006, a USA outbreak of E coli was linked to bagged spinach. It took regulators 2 weeks to conduct the trace back and determine the exact source of the outbreak. The IBM Food Trust network including a consortium of Walmart, Nestle, Unilever and others means that the same trace can now be done in 2.2 seconds.
  • In February 2017 Northern Trust launched the first commercial deployment of blockchain technology for private equity. Audit firms can now carry out audits of private equity lifecycle events directly from the blockchain in real-time.
  • IBM and shipping giant Maersk have formed a joint venture that offers a jointly developed global trade digitization platform built on open standards and designed for use by the entire global shipping ecosystem. It will address the need to provide more transparency and simplicity in the movement of goods across borders and trading zones with the digitisation and automation of paperwork filings for the import and export of goods.
  • Modum is a Swiss company who provide data services for pharmaceutical companies. Their platform uses smart contracts and external IoT sensors to track environmental conditions for pharmaceutical products while in transit to help with regulatory compliance in the European Union, which requires proof that the products were maintained in certain conditions during transport.
  • Spanish bank Santander has become the first company in the world to use blockchain to confirm each shareholder voter’s digital identity and so make it easier and more secure for investors to vote at an annual meeting.

The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) is investigating how blockchain could combat counterfeiting. Estonia was the first government to explore blockchain technology and their e-Estonia programme connects government services in a single digital platform. The USA’s Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced it had signed a two-year joint-development agreement with IBM Watson Health to explore using blockchain to securely share patient data. Dubai wants to become the first government in the world to conduct all of its transactions using blockchain, with a target deadline of 2020. In the UK HM Land Registry is exploring the technology to support their stated aim of digitising and automating 95% of their daily transactions by 2022.

The complication we have today is that not enough of these projects have gone beyond proof of concept to successful, enterprise scale, live solutions.  Since the concept has been around for almost a decade that’s a problem that, collectively, we need to fix.

The potential applications and benefits of blockchain technology apply across all business sectors, and each area of the business model canvas. It can help simplify international payments in banking, or clearing and settlement in financial markets. It could revolutionise land registry for individuals and governments, or access to medical data for health and life sciences. It can improve traceability in the supply chain and asset tracking, both physical and digital, across a whole host of industries or government applications. Secure digital identity will have huge ramifications for fraud prevention, compliance and for the provision of government services.

Land ownership, intellectual property and the role of the trusted intermediary mean that the legal profession is interested too. On top of the implications of the immutable ledger, smart contracts can be encoded in the blockchain technology. Clauses can be made partially or fully self-executing, self-enforcing, or both. The purpose (and potential) is to provide superior security compared to traditional contract law while reducing the cost and time associated with creating, agreeing and executing traditional contracts. Like the banks the major law firms are looking at their current business models and client relationships, looking for new ways of unlocking value, and so they are investing and exploring the possibilities too.

CONCLUSION

We asked where on the business model canvas can blockchain be applied, and the answer is in all 9 segments. It can be used to change the relationships you have with your customers, suppliers and channel partners. Companies will need to rethink their traditional business processes and change from business as usual to harness the efficiencies and the values blockchain can release, but we need to recognise that blockchain is evolving. As we said earlier, this is like the early stage of the Internet in the 90s. Back then it was a time of huge potential, rapid change with factors most organisations were only beginning to understand. At the start the scope was limited and the user experience was clunky. Major players in the sector like Google or Facebook didn’t exist or what they do wasn’t even conceived of as being useful yet. Fast forward to now and the Internet and these companies are part of the fabric of every day life, business and personal. Today we are still at that early stage in the development of blockchain’s distributed ledger capabilities, with technical solutions to questions we haven’t even asked yet still in the future, but not far away. Relevant to your business model? Relevant to trade? Trust me, take it seriously and factor it in to your transformation planning.

Challenge me if you disagree.  Contact us if you want to talk blockchain, business transformation and digital enablement.

Share this:

  • Tweet

Filed Under: blockchain, digital disruption, future

We love the smell of Blockchain in the morning

March 12, 2018 By David Terrar

We love the smell of Blockchain in the morning

Like napalm, blockchain is a portmanteau word, and you just have to sniff to sense how pervasive it is becoming in emerging technology conversations across the business landscape.  It’s a technology that’s on the lips of VCs, strategists and industry watchers talking about their next big idea and often framed as the next stage of evolution of the Internet.  A word that appears in the first sentence of the elevator pitch of many new technological ideas or solutions.  Does it need to be there or is it some pivot to hook on to the latest trend? A Techcrunch piece last month started with:

“Demand is off the charts for blockchain talent, and the capital is waiting to back it up. More than $3.7 billion has been raised through ICOs in the United States alone.”

Here we are less than 3 months in to 2018 and several days in to the the usual hype and excitement that surrounds the eclectic SXSW “technology meets entertainment” event currently going on in Austin, Texas, and I’m wondering whether this is an emerging technology that can be a force for good, or something that will take us to the heart of darkness.

We’ve been here before
This period in the blockchain hype cycle feels a lot like when we started talking Software as a Service in the mid 2000s and then Cloud Computing back in 2007.  Those of us there at the start of solutions based on SaaS (along with infrastructure and platforms as a service) worried about every provider with a hosted solution of some kind slapping on ‘aaS’ initially and then the ‘Cloud’ label to their offerings to ride the wave, and we had endless discussion and argument around what was “pure cloud” and what was “same old software as a service”.  We came up with definitions and tried to apply standards and it got messy.  In moving beyond the regular misuse and misunderstanding of the term, though, cloud computing became a useful catch all for the paradigm shift that was happening around us – the consumerization and commoditisation of IT services as part of the “Big Shift” and a core component of what Agile Elephant calls the Digital Enterprise Wave.  Blockchain’s following a similar course in much choppier waters.

Last week Adrianne Jeffries’ piece on The Verge worries that the blockchain term has become so widespread and misused that it’s quickly losing meaning, quoting David Gerard, author of Attack of the 50 Foot Blockchain: Bitcoin, Blockchain, Ethereum & Smart Contracts, saying in an email:

“What is a ‘blockchain’? The word is a buzzword that is increasingly ill-defined,”

He has a point.  Some people know what they are talking about, but when others say blockchain do the really just mean a secure, distributed database of some kind?  There is both bad and good information on this, with bad and good definitions out there.  For example, when I was researching this article I found a Fortune/Bloomberg piece from last December titled Blockchain Is Pumping New Life Into Old-School Companies Like IBM and Visa, that contains the sentence: “The blockchain can also hold many more documents and data than traditional database storage, allowing for more nuanced insights and analysis.”  Now that’s rubbish on many levels, and dangerous too.

We need some clarity
That’s exactly why I’ll try to explain what blockchain is by answering the question “what’s the difference between a blockchain and a traditional database?”.  As well as following my explanation, I want to refer you to three sources.  Please read CEO of Integra Ledger, David Fisher’s excellent guest post on Artificial Lawyer – What Really Is Blockchain and Why Does It Matter to Lawyers?  Also read Shaan Ray’s Blockchains versus Traditional Databases, and finally here on the AE blog, Alan Patrick’s Blockchain Economics – the Reality. Can your application afford the transaction costs?

What is blockchain?
A blockchain is a distributed (or decentralised) ledger, implemented across many networked servers, consisting of a continuously growing list of records, called blocks, which are linked across the whole network and secured using cryptography.  This technology allows several parties or competitors to share a digital ledger across the network of computers without the need for a central authority.  The combination of cryptography and the fact that each block addition is “witnessed” across many servers means that, in practice, no single party has the power or resources to tamper with the records.  The problem we are solving here is trust.  Blockchain’s key advantage is that the parties or competitors can trust the digital ledger without the need for any intermediary like a bank or broker or lawyer or government being involved.  How disruptive is that!

What’s the difference between a blockchain and a traditional database?
Traditional databases are based on CRUD.  No, not rubbish, but the concept that somebody has the ability to write a program that creates, reads, updates or deletes individual records in a database sitting on storage connected to a central server somewhere. Somebody has the administration rights for that database.  Depending on the particular database technology and the way the software accessing it is designed, any changes might be tracked by who made the change, date and time stamped, and then duplicated somewhere else for backup and recovery purposes.  You can use all sorts of security measures and cryptography to protect the integrity of the data, but two things remain true.   First, some one person or central authority has administration rights to keep the data secure and control access on everyone’s behalf.  Second, the individual records in the database can be changed.  If a malicious agent wants to beat the cyber security measures put in place so that they can hack the data, they have one place to work and do their dirty work.

Blockchain databases consist of several, distributed compute server and storage nodes, all of which participate in the administration and verification of the data all of the time.  Instead of CRUD, blockchain technology can only create and read.  Somebody writing the program to use this kind of database can only read existing blocks and add or append additional blocks.  The blockchain technology performs only two functions – the validation of existing transactions and the addition of new ones.  All of the nodes in the network are capable of adding new blocks.  All of the nodes of the network verify every existing and new block.  That means that the malicious agent who wants to beat the cryptographic encryption needs to do that simultaneously on all the nodes of the network, making it so difficult and expensive in compute power (with current technology) as to be impossible in practice.  That’s why this form of distributed ledger technology can be considered immutable.  That’s why you can trust a blockchain ledger.

What works, what doesn’t, what’s next?
As Alan’s post here on the Agile Elephant blog highlighted there are places where this technology is appropriate and works well.  What is worrying is that not everyone is understanding or considering the compute power required by the distributed blockchain model where every add must be verified across all of the nodes of the network, and that has an effect on the rate of transactions you can put through this type of database compared to a traditional centralised one.  There are a lot of applications currently being suggested for blockchain that won’t be able to cope with that operational and economic overhead.  Alan puts it succinctly when he suggests:

“Somewhere between the hype, hope and heuristics is a major disconnect”

So what happens next and can blockchain be a force for good?  To answer that question I asked our good friend, author, fintech expert and entrepreneur Dinis Guarda.  Dinis and I both lecture on Groupe INSEEC’s digital marketing MBA programme.  Back in September 2016 he spoke on IoT and Blockchain at one of Agile Elephant’s regular meetup sessions, explaining his belief that blockchain in the IoT will not be implemented without significant platform development by companies with deep pockets.  Then at the Enterprise Digital Summit Paris in 2017 he keynoted on “Blockchain and the Decentralisation of Business”.  He’s considered one of the top blockchain and cryptography influencers in the world, and most recently his company Ztudium sold their blockchain and cryptocurrency with rewards tokenization platform called Blockimpact to Canadian firm Glance Technologies.  Glance owns and operates Glance Pay, a streamlined mobile payment system, and Dinis is now on their advisory board.  Talking to him around blockchain he recognises that, like any tool, it can be used for good and bad, but it needs to be understood and a lot of work needs to be done on the scalability of the technology.

Actually, Dinis is just about to publish his next book titled “Blockchain, AI and Crypto Economics – The Next Tsunami?”.  We’ll be reporting from the book launch next month.  If you want to get a flavour for what Dinis will be saying, go to this Slideshare from one of his recent presentations.  Dinis argues that these emerging technologies are turning the wave in to a veritable tsunami.  He suggests that we are just in the early stages of the digitalisation and disruption of the financial industry.  These new digital models of decentralised and distributed finance and economics can impact society in both positive and negative ways.  Dinis explains:”

“Governments, regulators and financial institutions need to consider these decentralised models to enhance industry resilience, integrity and work in governance structures while using data driven technologies to leverage this.  Crypto economics models need to to be at the centre of any government, financial organisation or regulator, and by chain effect, any business.”

Dinis’s next venture has very positive intentions around life sciences and healthcare and will pull all of this technology together with artificial intelligence and data analysis using a proprietary peer to peer network.  It’s called Lifesci.  He couldn’t tell me much about it yet, but we’ll be watching closely and reporting when we can.  Expect more when the new book comes out in a few weeks, and we’ll be finding and writing about good use cases over the coming months.  Please contact us if you’ve got any good suggestions or want to find out more.

(Header image frame grab from the excellent Apocalypse Now, copyright Omni Zoetrope United Artists)

Share this:

  • Tweet

Filed Under: blockchain, digital disruption, finance

Global Legal Hackathon in London this weekend – an update

February 21, 2018 By David Terrar

Global Legal Hackathon in London this weekend – an update

What happens when you get a bunch of lawyers, coders, designers, consultants and marketing types with their laptops and cloud platforms together over a weekend?  Well, we think it will turn in to something special!

Just over 3 weeks ago Agile Elephant volunteered, along with  Cambridge Strategy Group and Pinsent Masons to host the London stream the Global Legal Hackathon (GLH). We mean this weekend, 2 days time on February 23-25 at Pinsent Masons’ london office in the City.  A winner will be declared for London on Sunday and that team will go through to a global competition with all the other cities, culminating with a winner announced at a banquet in New York on April 21.  This will be the world’s largest legal hackathon happening simultaneously in over 40 cities and 20 countries.

All of the details and how to register are at: LegalHackathon.London

It’s been a mad 3 weeks getting our act together, using social media to connect and get the message out.  Our friends at diginomica have written about it this way:

Law firm Pinsent Masons hosts upcoming Global Legal Hackathon London

Over on CompareTheCloud I did this guest post:

Join the World’s Largest Legal Hackathon this weekend

The Law Sites blog has thrown down a worthy gauntlet and challenged us to change the world for the better with:

With ‘Hadfield Challenges,’ Global Legal Hackathon Urges Participants to Address ‘Problems Worth Solving’

But just in case you haven’t seen the details, here is what it’s all about and where we are at with 2 days to go.

What is the goal of a team entering the GLH?
The goal is to apply innovative ideas and emerging technologies to progress the business of law or facilitate access to justice for the public.  Teams of 3 to 6 will come up with a prototype or proposal at the end of the hackathon to present in front of a panel of judges.  We expect ideas using technologies like AI, Machine Learning, Chatbots, Blockchain, or the Internet of Things.

Where and when?
At Pinsent Masons office at 30 Crown Place, Earl Street, London EC2A 4ES, (including their client centre on the 15th floor with stunning views over London) over the weekend of February 23-25.  18:00 start on Friday, working all day Saturday and most of Sunday, judging takes place from 16:00-18:00 on Sunday and a winner will be announced before 19:00.

Who are the Judges and Mentors?

Our judges are Christina Blacklaws, Deputy Vice President of the Law Society, Frank Jennings the “Cloud Lawyer”, and Dr Richard Sykes chair of the Cloud Industry Forum and Joanna Goodman, Author and IT columnist for the Law Society Gazette.

Our mentors, to help advise and keep the teams on track include Sophia Adams-Bhati, Julie Gottlieb, Richard Tromans, Silvia Cambie, Dennis Howlett, Alan Patrick, Janet Parkinson, Rob Millard and me.

Who is supporting this?

There are a lot of people to thank!  IBM and Microsoft are providing developers some free access to their cloud platforms.  LexisNexis & JG Consulting are our local sponsors.  The Law Society, the Society for Computers and Law and Disruptive.Live are supporting us too.  The Global sponsors are  Integra, IBM Watson Legal, the Global Legal Blockchain Consortium, Cadence, LawDroid and ONE400

Who will be Hacking?

We’ve got teams entered from LexisNexis, Pinsent Masons, Vodafone, and Hult International Business School.  Other participants are coming from IBM, Fliplet, Jurit LLP, Hook Tangaza, Sumitomo Electric Finance UK, Said Business School, Legalytics, Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr Inc, The Incorporated Council of Law Reporting for England and Wales, European Banking Authority, The Founder, Legal Utopia, The Law Society, Bryan Cave, Queen Mary University, Thomson Reuters, Kitmobs, Look, YADA Events, Teal Legal, Bank of America Merrill Lynch, City University, Oxford University, and Westminster University.  We’ve got capacity for 110 and 12 teams, but we still need more participants to sign up.

How can you get involved in the GLH?

  • Hacker teams and team members – Anyone involved in the law, interested in the law, involved in technology for the law, or coders and technologists who want to join the fun.  We know some firms will submit teams, and other teams will form around a great idea at the GLH.
  • Helpers – We need volunteers over the weekend to make it happen and keep everyone happy.
  • Mentors – We need subject matter experts and technologists who can mentor the teams over the weekend to help crystallise their ideas, challenge them, or keep them on track.
  • Judges – We’ve got 3 great judges, but may add 1 or 2 more.
  • Sponsors – As well as the venue we will be providing food and drinks, name tags and supplies.  We may even add a main prize and additional prizes.  We need sponsors interested in helping us fund all of this – modest amounts in the range £250-500.  This is a ‘not for profit’ exercise for the hosts, but we need to cover our costs (mostly pizza and drinks).

Follow us on Social Media
We will use social media hashtags #GlobalLegalHack & #GLH2018.  Follow the GLH on Twitter at @WorldHackathon and the London organisers @robmillard & @DT.  GLH have also partnered with legal media sources  ArtificialLawyer.com and Legal Talk Network.  Our friends at Disruptive.Live will be generating video and live content and diginomica and the Law Society Gazette will be reporting on the event.

We want to have fun, and really make a difference for the legal profession.  Will we?   Please come and join us and find out!

Share this:

  • Tweet

Filed Under: blockchain, business innovation, creativity, design thinking, digital disruption, events, future

Get involved in the Global Legal Hackathon in London

February 11, 2018 By David Terrar

Get involved in the Global Legal Hackathon in London

You will have heard that Cambridge Strategy Group, Agile Elephant and Pinsent Masons are the joint team hosting the London event for the world’s largest legal hackathon – the Global Legal Hackathon (GLH) on February 23-25.  A winner will be declared for London and that team will go through to a global competition, culminating with a winner announced at a banquet in New York on April 21.

Here is an update of where we are at so far.

First, two of the founders of the GLH, David Fisher, the CEO of Integra Ledger, and Aileen Schultz, their Director of Network Intelligence,  introduce the Hackathon in this video:

Next, we’ve created a new site with all of the London specific details at LegalHackathon.London where you can register for the event, and find out the ways you can enter a team, become a helper, a mentor or one of our sponsors:

 

Lastly, we can report that the word is spreading, and we have a steady flow of registered participants.  We’ve got teams from Pinsent Masons, and LexisNexis (who are also our first local sponsor), as well as sign ups from Vodafone Group, Hook Tangaza, Legal Utopia, Bryan Cave, JG Consultants, City University, Thomson Reuters, Bank of America Merrill Lynch, YADA Events, FromCounsel, Jurit, Mills & Reeve, Fliplet, and Westminster University.  On top of those there are a number of organisations who’ve committed to be involved but haven’t registered yet.  Microsoft are supporting us with free access to the Azure platform for developers, and IBM will be giving us access to their technology too.  More technology partners will be announced soon.

Our friends at diginomica and the Artificial Lawyer will be coming along to report from the event, and we have teamed up with Disruptive.Live to produce video content and live streams.

Watch out for more news and announcements in the coming week.

Register for London

Find out about London

The Global Event

Share this:

  • Tweet

Filed Under: artificial intelligence & robotics, blockchain, digital disruption, emerging technologies, events, innovation

We want you for the Global Legal Hackathon in London!

February 2, 2018 By David Terrar

We want you for the Global Legal Hackathon in London!

Agile Elephant are proud to be joining Cambridge Strategy Group and Pinsent Masons as the joint team hosting the London event for the world’s largest legal hackathon – the Global Legal Hackathon on February 23-25.  It’s only 3 weeks away, and we need your help!  We need hacker teams and team members, helpers for the weekend to make it happen, mentors to advise the teams and keep them on track, and sponsors to help cover the costs – this is a not for profit initiative for the 3 host companies involved, and we are delighted to be supported by the Law Society too.

So what is this thing all about?  Let me explain….

What is the Global Legal Hackathon?
The Global Legal Hackathon (GLH) is happening simultaneously over the weekend of February 23-25 in more than 40 cities, across 6 continents.  The purpose is the rapid development of solutions to improve the legal industry using innovative ideas and emerging technologies like Artificial Intelligence, Blockchain, or the Internet of Things.  The GLH will engage law schools, law firms and in-house departments, legal technology companies, governments, and service providers to the legal industry across the globe.

What is a Hackathon?
A hackathon is a competition where multi-disciplinary teams come together to collaborate, build and launch mobile or web apps aimed at solving a particular problem. They usually work in small groups over a couple of days.  People can come individually or as a team, with an existing idea to pitch, or to listen and join one of the teams that will be formed at the start of the event.  The goal is to come up with a prototype or proposal at the end of the hackathon to present in front of a panel of judges.

In our case teams will be a minimum of 3 and a suggested maximum of 6.  Anyone has the chance to pitch an idea at the start of the event on Friday evening, teams will be formed, they’ll work over the weekend, and then present to the judges at the end of the weekend.  A winner will be declared for London and that team will go through to a global competition, culminating with a winner announced at a banquet in New York on April 21.

It is a competition, but we aim to be inclusive.  All teams must be willing to accept individual participants on the first day of the event.

What is the goal of a team entering the GLH?
The goal is to apply innovative ideas and emerging technologies to progress the business of law or facilitate access to justice for the public.

Who is organising the London GLH?
The London event is being organised by Cambridge Strategy Group, Agile Elephant, and Pinsent Masons who are kindly providing the venue at 30 Crown Place, Earl Street, London EC2A 4ES.

Who is behind the GLH?
The GLH is being organised globally by Integra, IBM Watson Legal, the Global Legal Blockchain Consortium, Cadence and ONE400.

Who are the judges for the London GLH?
We are assembling a balanced team of 5 judges, which we hope to announce soon.

How do I get involved in the GLH?
It’s free to get involved – go to GlobalLegalHackathon.com and register.  Then download the Cadence event app to your phone and complete your profile.  To find the app on the app store, it is best to search for Cadence and events.  We will use a mix of email, the Cadence app, social media and our various websites to make announcements and keep you posted on our progress.

In what ways can I get involved in the GLH?
We need:

  • Hacker teams and team members – Anyone involved in the law, interested in the law, involved in technology for the law, or coders and technologists who want to join the fun.  We know some firms will submit teams, and other teams will form around a great idea at the GLH.
  • Helpers – We need volunteers over the weekend of February 23-25 to make it happen and keep everyone happy.
  • Mentors – We need subject matter experts and technologists who can mentor the teams over the weekend to help crystallise their ideas, challenge them, or keep them on track.
  • Judges – We are assembling a balanced team of 5 (don’t call us, we’ll call you).
  • Sponsors – As well as the venue we will be providing food and drinks, name tags and supplies.  We may even add a main prize and additional prizes.  We need sponsors interested in helping us fund all of this.  This is a ‘not for profit’ exercise for the hosts, but we need to cover our costs.

Who do I contact if I want to participate or help?
Get in touch with Rob Millard or David Terrar, but please register, download Cadence to your phone and then you will be able to message us directly through the app.

How do I make a noise about this?
We will be broadcasting on social media channels using the hashtags #GlobalLegalHack & #GLH2018.  Follow the GLH on Twitter at @WorldHackathon and follow the London organisers at @robmillard & @DT.  GLH have also partnered with legal media sources  ArtificialLawyer.com and Legal Talk Network.

Where do I find out more?
All of the detail about the event including the judging rubric, event schedule, the other cities and companies involved and more can be found at GlobalLegalHackathon.com, where you will find guidance for attendees, guidance for hosts, or just ask.

We’re really looking forward to it!

UPDATE:

The London stream of the GLH now has its own website at LegalHackathon.London

Share this:

  • Tweet

Filed Under: artificial intelligence & robotics, blockchain, business innovation, digital disruption, emerging technologies, events, future

5 reasons why 2007 was a Tipping Point (and a Turning Point) in our Digital Journey

March 19, 2017 By David Terrar

5 reasons why 2007 was a Tipping Point (and a Turning Point) in our Digital Journey

Both really.  2007 was pivotal.  A big year in our digital history. It was also the year “An Inconvenient Truth” won the Oscar for best documentary, and Al Gore told us we only had 10 years to save the planet. It was the year my literary hero Kurt Vonnegut died. The Police and the Spice Girls both did reunion tours. J. K. Rowling published the 7th and final novel in the Harry Potter series (she’s on a reunion tour of sorts herself 10 years on), but these aren’t the reasons 2007 was so important.

I started thinking about this a few weeks back, on 14th February, when I celebrated 10 years on Twitter, but I’m getting ahead of myself. We’ve been talking digital since Nicholas Negroponte’s Being Digital book in 1995, with a steady build up of the technologies and associated behaviours that have changed marketing and insinuated themselves in to general business use, changing things completely in the intervening 22 years. Here are 5 reasons, though, why 2007 stands out during that seismic shift.

The iPhone was announced (but it was a slow burn)
Invitations to the Macworld event on 9th January 2007 suggested that the last 30 years had been just the beginning, and everything was about to change. Actually we only realised this was true and not Apple marketing hype several years later. At the now famous keynote, after more than half an hour of other announcements, Steve Jobs explained:

“Well today, we’re introducing THREE revolutionary new products. The first one is a widescreen ipod with touch controls. The second is a revolutionary new mobile phone (the crowd went wild). And the third is a breakthrough internet communications device (they were less wild about that).”

And all 3 were the same device. But it was expensive. On top that we had to wait – it wasn’t going to be available until 29th June. It did, however, completely redefine the smart phone (and multi touch screen) user interface, but on initial announcement the iPhone was a closed device. It was only available on one US network, Cingular, and only available with a small collection of native apps. Steve told people that Apple and Cingular needed it to be that way because:

“You don’t want your phone to be an open platform. You don’t want it to not work because one of three apps you loaded that morning screwed it up” and “Cingular doesn’t want to see their West Coast network go down because of some app”.

Where would we be now if Steve had stuck with that position? Actually and thankfully, things had all changed before the end of 2007, but you also need to be reminded of the rest of the smart phone landscape of the time. The major smart phone players were Nokia, Motorola, Sony and BlackBerry (where are they all now?). The Nokia smart phone market share high point was in Q4 of 2007 at 50.9%! Personally, this was the year I upgraded from a Blackberry 8700 to a Blackberry Curve. At the time I considered the Nokia E61i, but not the iPhone. I tried the soft keyboard and just couldn’t get on with it. Actually, one of the coolest phones to own in 2007 was the Nokia n95 which, at the time, was the most powerful smart phone (with apps) you could buy as well as being a satnav, a camera, a player of music, and it was a phone too. If you look at the market share statistics going forward many of us continued to buy non Apple smart phones well in to 2009.

What made the iPhone a real game changer was Steve Jobs 180 degree turn around in June 2007, when he opened up the operating system to 3rd party developers. Then the SDK was announced in October, and once we had the associated app store and developer ecosystem, that really changed everything. In the discussion threads of the time Apple said “It will take until February (2008) to release an SDK because we’re trying to do two diametrically opposed things at once—provide an advanced and open platform to developers while at the same time protect iPhone users from viruses, malware, privacy attacks, etc. This is no easy task.” Collecting all of 2007’s iPhone announcements together, the smart phone market was recast and Android followed in its footsteps.

Twitter took flight (and became a company)
I mentioned above that I jumped on board the Twitter train on 14 February 2007, but at that stage it was only social media and “web 2.0 (remember that?)” type geeks who were using it. As you’ll know Twitter was started as a side project by Biz Stone, Evan Williams, and Jack Dorsey while they were working at Odeo during 2006. Most of the usage was in the US only, and at the start of 2007 it was creeping out to my UK and European friends by word of mouth. In March, at that year’s South by Southwest (SXSW) event, things began to take flight. The Twitter stream was set on two 60-inch plasma screens in the hallway between the sessions and it became the event’s back channel. Speakers at the event referenced it, and the bloggers got on board. All of the rest of the attendees told their friends. Twitter staff received the festival’s Web Award prize. As a result Twitter usage jumped from 20,000 tweets a day to 60,000. Suddenly Biz, Evan, Jack and their team realised they had something. Twitter was spun out in to a separate company the very next month – April 2007.

On 23rd August Chris Messina suggested using # for grouping tweets, inspired by old style IRC. Stowe Boyd dubbed that the hashtag a few days later. Twitter followed up by adding the functionality required. Hashtags were widely used that year in the tweet stream connected to the San Diego forest fires. Usage also took off in Japan as well as Europe. The year that Twitter became really mainstream was arguably 2009, but there is no doubt 2007 was the tipping point.

Zuckerberg had just turned down 1$Bn, but opened up Facebook instead
Remember where Facebook was back then. During 2006 their growth had tailed off approaching 8 million users. Yahoo came calling and offered (22 year old) Mark Zuckerberg $1Bn and he verbally agreed to sell in July 2006. To put things in context, Yahoo had hundreds of millions of users at that time. MySpace was at 100 million users by August 2006. Yahoo’s timing was poor, though. Just after the offer to Zuckerberg they reported slower sales and earnings growth, and delays launching their new advertising platform. Their share price dropped 22% overnight, and Terry Semel, the CEO, subsequently cut their offer for Facebook down to $800m. They put the offer back up a couple of months later, but the damage was done and Zuckerberg didn’t sell – how different would things be now if that set of circumstances hadn’t happened?

Zuckerberg convinced his board they could do better, and started to focus beyond students, opened up membership to everyone, created the news feed and started mapping everyone’s social graph, with an emphasis on real identity and putting more of your personal information online. By January 2007 they had jumped to 14 million users, but the key move happened on 24th May 2007. At a massive press and developer event in San Francisco, they officially launched Facebook Platform, opening up for developers to build apps to help make it even easier for friends to communicate and do more. By the end of August they were at 36 million users, signing up at the rate of 1 million new users a month! It was during 2007 that I first started overhearing “normal” people on the Tube in London talking about Facebook. The die was cast. Facebook became a phenomenon in its own right rather than being lost inside of Yahoo… and MySpace who?

We all started talking Cloud
Clouds had been used in network communications and IT diagrams right back to the 60s, but the first use in the context of distributed computing was by Andy Hertzfeld in a Wired article in 1994. Quite some while later in a Q&A on 9 August 2006, at the Search Engine Strategies Conference, Eric Schmidt of Google talked of an emergent new model. He said:

“It starts with the premise that the data services and architecture should be on servers. We call it cloud computing – they should be in a “cloud” somewhere.”

A couple of weeks later on 25th August 2006, Amazon announced a limited public beta test of something called Elastic Cloud Compute or EC2. Infrastructure as a Service was here alongside the Software as a Service consumer and business applications that we were getting used to. Before this people were talking about webware and web 2.0, but suddenly Cloud was a great catch all term to use. Although the trend’s origin was in 2006, it was 2007 when Cloud Computing took hold in the language of technology. I trace my own usage of it back to that year, and that’s when I remember Simon Wardley and many others in the IT space talking cloud and utility computing for the first time. It wasn’t until 2009 or 2010 that the hype around the concept really started, but 2007 was when we all started talking Cloud.

It’s the year that Social Media started to really mean Business
The visionaries who wrote the Cluetrain Manifesto could see what was beginning to happen as far back as 1999, but 2007 was the year the momentum really picked up. Although I’d been blogging since 2005, and meeting up with like minded people at various events talking social media, web based tools and enterprise 2.0 as well as web 2.0, something different began to happen coming in to 2007. Behaviours started to change. In October 2006 I attended Ishmael Ghalimi’s (brilliant) first Office 2.0 Conference, which connected me to so many great people and helped kick off my 2007 with fresh thinking. I picked up organising and running a monthly meetup on using wiki technology in business called London Wiki Wednesdays in February 2007. I started attending Saul Klein’s weekly London OpenCoffee meetings. Although they had been set up to facilitate start-ups meeting VCs and angel investors, more and more people interested in the new stuff happening at the edge began to turn up too. Elsewhere Chinwag Live was happening. There was a buzz as marketing, communications and PR people wanted to understand the new approaches and how things were changing. Developers with an idea came looking for help or to share what they’d prototyped. Creativity was flowing and connections were being made.

During 2007 those OpenCoffee sessions got busier and busier, moving from the Starbucks in the Esprit on Regent Street, to the 5th Floor of Waterstones on Piccadilly. More and more people started working in cafés plugged in to wifi – suddenly I wasn’t the only one hunting for a power point. Actually the social media geeks that turned up to OpenCoffee during 2007 needed their own home, and when Lloyd Davis started thinking about a London form of Social Media Café, we all gravitated there. You can read Lloyd’s musings from August 2007 – the beginning of what became The Tuttle Club (after the character Harry Tuttle in the movie Brazil – find out why he was our hero here). Lloyd ran the first few sessions in 2007 and the savvy amongst us moved over from OpenCoffee to his place. It really took off during 2008 – by then the venue was the Coach and Horses in Soho and it was happening weekly, but the momentum for all of this definitely started in 2007. The social media oriented crowd in London were meeting, making new alliances, forming new companies, developing products, trying things out, and connecting with people from all over the World. Suddenly we were talking about Social Media Marketing, Social Media in Business and influencers. I can only talk in detail about London, but from my connections I know similar things were happening in San Francisco, but also New York, LA, Boston, Paris, Munich, Milan, Vancouver, all over. I’m sure you will have your own stories, but I can trace a lot of my ideas and network of friends and collaborators back to that seminal year.

So, there’s my case for 2007. It’s only been 10 years, yet it seems longer. So much of what we talked about that year has moved from the edge to mainstream business thinking today. The rate of change is only accelerating and we have a raft of emerging technologies to consider with amazing potential. Every business is (or should be) planning for disruption and new business models, and figuring out how to harness more digital technology in to the products and services they provide. I wonder how much longer we’ll be using the digital term, and I wonder what what will replace it – what comes next?

By the way, I’ve been one of several volunteers proof reading Cecil Dijoux’s soon to be published book on Hyperlean and all things digital. In his prologue to the book he says (will say):

“If there is a year to be marked as a milestone, as the kick-off of the major innovations we have witnessed recently, 2007 is a great contender.”

Like minded – absolutely! I recommend you check out his book as soon as it is published – some great content and ideas in there.

And if you want some help making sense of digital please just ask or contact us.

Share this:

  • Tweet

Filed Under: digital disruption, future, ideas Tagged With: Apple, cloud, digital transformation, Facebook, iPhone, social media, Twitter

Enterprise Digital Summit London in tweets and photos

November 26, 2016 By David Terrar

Enterprise Digital Summit London in tweets and photos

Here is a first taste of the story of last Thursday’s Enterprise Digital Summit London in tweets and photos. Our aim is to put on London’s most enterprise oriented event on digital transformation, helping organisations change mindset to deal with the incredible technological and competitive pressures of the 21C world of work. Here is the day from the audience’s perspective. We’ll publish posts, an event report, videos and more photos soon:

This gallery of photos below are all taken by our friend across from Germany Ellen Trude:









More content coming soon.  If you want to find out more about our approach, or you need help with your digital strategy, then please contact us.

 

Share this:

  • Tweet

Filed Under: #EntDigi conference, agile business, corporate culture, digital disruption, digital transformation strategy, events Tagged With: British Academy, digital transformation, London

What is the Digital Enterprise Wave?

November 21, 2016 By David Terrar

What is the Digital Enterprise Wave?

We collaborate with and guest lecture at Henley Business School.  As part of their input to the future FutureLearn project I was filmed as part of the promotional video for their course “Digital Leadership: Creating Value Through Technology”.  FutureLearn is a free resource with hundreds of free online courses from top universities and specialist organisations.  The latest edition of the Henley course started on 7 Nov, but check out what else is available from this excellent resource.
Digital Enterprise Wave simpleThe guys at Motion Blur Studios filmed me explaining what we call the Digital Enterprise Wave.  We’ve been talking digital for more than 20 years with the shifts to cloud computing, social technologies and mobile at the heart of the changes.  The resulting disruption has many explanations, but we use the metaphor of the wave to explain the onslaught of transformational technology that is changing both our personal lives and the world of work.  Watch the short video on Vimeo or above, or go here for more.
If you want help making sense of digital and how to distribute it across your enterprise, then join us at the Enterprise Digital Summit London.  Follow the link here or below to find out more.

eds_blogteaser16

Share this:

  • Tweet

Filed Under: #EntDigi conference, digital disruption Tagged With: digital disruption, Digital Enterprise Wave, digital transformation, FutureLearn, Henley Business School, MOOC

Barclays doing Digital differently

October 10, 2016 By David Terrar

Barclays doing Digital differently

Back at our first, November 2014 version of the Enterprise Digital Summit London, Dave Shepherd, Director of Eagle Labs & Digital Eagles for Barclays Bank, came to speak about their Digital Eagles programme.  Barclays decided to create a team of front line staff who are on hand in branches across the UK, actively encouraging and educating customers and non-customers to acquire digital skills, so they feel confident to explore technology – a team of over 12,000 has been created so far.  Dave invited me down to Brighton to visit their latest initiative – a network of business incubators and fully equipped maker spaces called Eagle Labs.  Barclays are an excellent example of a well known, established brand with a long history that is approaching Digital in a new way.

_mg_5868They are re-using under utilised branch offices or other spaces to create this network of Eagle Labs.  They piloted the idea in Bournemouth and then Cambridge – Brighton was the third.  They’ve got 6 now, Notting Hill in London opens shortly, with Jersey, Norwich, Salford on the cards.  Barclays are taking a “fail fast” approach, trying things out in each new Lab, and learning as they go.  The initiative itself feels more like a start-up than something run by a big corporate entity, and I’m sure that difference in cultural approach is key to making this a success.
_mg_5849The space I visited is a perfect example of what they are trying to achieve.  The building started life as the Brighton Union Bank back in 1870.  It had been a Barclays branch for decades, but had closed, laying derelict and empty.  The lease runs to 2018.  Barclays have smartened up the outside, reclaimed and refurbished the space, finding ways to convert the old branch infrastructure for its new use as cost effectively as possible.  The old branch manager’s office has become their maker lab with a laser cutter, 3D printer and all of the tools you would need to build a prototype for your business idea.  One of the old bank vaults downstairs, with it’s very impressive steel door has become a photographic studio.  Rather than take the corporate approach of laying expensive new flooring and a typical office refit, they’ve sanded down the old parquet flooring, renovated the old doors and are trying to retain as much of the character of the building’s history as they can, much as you would with a house renovation project.  The old bank “front of house” has become shared office space for the incubator start-ups and small business.  An office upstairs where cheques and local accounts would have been processed has become a presentation and meeting room for hire, with more of the feel of the kind of space you would find at Google, with bean bags and a coffee table made from a big old reel for industrial cable – not what you would expect from one of the oldest retail banks in the country.

_mg_5882Barclays aren’t taking a traditional venture capital style incubator approach.  They don’t take a stake in the businesses, although they do pay rent to the Lab, and of course Barclays would like to bring them on board as business banking customers.  However, a key part of what they are trying to do is connect to the local business community and build relationships in the way that a local branch manager would have done in the past, before retail banks started to centralise everything in the quest for cost savings and efficiency.  They want to build an ecosystem of coaching, support and partners who work from the Lab to help the members and connect with the local area.  While I was there I met two locals who had left corporate jobs to freelance in marketing and training – something that’s happening a lot around the UK.  They’d popped in to use the photographic studio for half an hour to take better quality head shots for their LinkedIn profile.  I saw the laser cutter demonstrated _mg_5871to some people with a product idea.  I met Ryk, a user experience expert who runs TeamPro, a great looking start-up that works from the shared office space that provides free websites for sports teams.  I heard about open days for local businesses that the Lab runs to show what they do.  I saw that they run “Mend it Mondays” – for £5 they have an open session where their on-site technicians will help fix your broken stuff, or use the workshop to build new things.
I was introduced to Dave’s boss Steven Roberts, Strategic Transformation Director at the Bank. He told me:

“Bankers have traditionally been at the heart of their community, helping people with their finances, and supporting local business. The Eagle Labs initiative aims to strengthen that connection with direct help in new ways of working and emerging technology for start-ups and local businesses.  After Digital Eagles it’s the logical, next step for us to be building digital skills in the business community.”

The Brighton Lab provides a home for business advisors, brokers, web site designers, and businesses creating new apps and digital services.  It hosts 2 permanent offices with 4 staff in each, has 2 meeting spaces for hire or use by the members, a maker space, and the main area supports 25 co-workers.  They’ve linked to the local maker community and provide a hub for emerging technology in the local community.  Compared to their peers, Barclays are thinking differently, and doing digital differently.

_mg_5877

All photographs by Rhys Terrar


Extras:

30 photographs from our visit to the Brighton Eagle Lab

Steam Co’s video of the Brighton Eagle Lab Launch (with Steven Roberts and Dave Shepherd):

Find out more about this year’s Enterprise Digital Summit London:

eds_blogteaser16

Share this:

  • Tweet

Filed Under: #EntDigi conference, digital disruption, digital literacy, innovation, workplace Tagged With: Barclays Bank, Digital Eagles, digital transformation, Eagle Labs, Incubator, Maker Space, Start-Up

Next Page »

Sign up for our regular Agile Elephant Newsletter - news, posts, ideas and more.

My Tweets

From the Agile Elephant Blog

  • The Metaverse doesn’t exist yet, but…
  • Impossible Things get Disruptive
  • Clarity, Cloud, and Culture Change at IBM

What Next?
Take a look around our site, check out our approach, see how we can help, join the conversation on our blog or contact us to find out more.

About Us

Agile Elephant is a new kind of consultancy designed to help companies embrace the new digital culture of social collaboration, sharing and openness that is changing business models and the world of work.

Contact us to find out more!

Our founder's blogs:

broadstuff

@DT on Medium

Technotropolis

Our blog:

The Agile Elephant Blog

Site Log In | Site Log Out

Subscribe to Site RSS

Subscribe to our Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe

Copyright © 2025 ·Streamline Pro Theme · Genesis Framework by StudioPress · WordPress · Log in