Agile Elephant making sense of digital transformation

innovation | digital transformation | value creation | (r)evoloution

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Home
  • Manifesto
  • Services
    • Our Approach
    • Our Services
    • Making Collaboration Work Packages
    • Collaboration Solutions
    • Our Experience
    • Workshops
    • Innovation
  • About Us
    • The Team
    • Why we do what we do
    • Why are we called Agile Elephant?
    • Our Partners
    • Our Clients
  • Get Involved
    • Events
    • Meetups
    • Unconference
    • Newsletter
  • Resources
    • What is Digital Transformation?
    • What is the Digital Enterprise Wave?
    • Our Research
    • Case Studies
    • People We Follow
    • Articles & Links
    • Books That Inspire
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Home Archives for blockchain
#GLH2020 launches the GLH Inclusivity Challenge

February 12, 2020 By David Terrar

#GLH2020 launches the GLH Inclusivity Challenge

We just yesterday blogged the details and opened registration for the London edition of this year’s Global Legal Hackathon, which might be the largest hackathon ever!  To add to an already great event, The Global Legal Hackathon have just a short while ago announced a worldwide collaboration with with She Breaks the Law, RSG Consulting, and global law firm BCLP to launch the GLH Inclusivity Challenge and you’ll know inclusivity, diversity and LGBTQ issues are always high on our agenda.  In any case the GLH weekend coincides with International Women’s Day (March 8), so the idea is a natural fit!

GLH2020 adds the GLH Inclusivity Challenge

The 2020 Global Legal Hackathon will be held between March 6-8 simultaneously in more than 50 cities and 25 countries around the world.  This year is the third year Agile Elephant has co-hosted London with our friends at Cambridge Strategy Group, and our the second year that the venue is kindly provided by the University of Westminster, although this year we are moving to a bigger space at their Marylebone Campus.  

As we’ve described, our goal is to get legal brains, marketers, business analysts and coders in to teams over a weekend creating apps and services that improve the practice and business of law, or provide better access to law for the public.  We’ll be fuelling their creativity with beer and pizza, although other food and beverages (including wine) will be available too, thanks to our sponsors – this is a not for profit exercise, and free to enter for all participants (so somebody has to cover our costs please!).  But this year, the Global organisers are setting this extra challenge:

“Participants and teams around the world, in every Global Legal Hackathon city, are challenged to invent new ways to increase equity, diversity, and inclusion in the legal industry.”

At the conclusion of GLH weekend, a local winner of the GLH Inclusivity Challenge will be selected by each city alongside the main winner, and will progress to a global semi-finals too. This will be an extra stream and, like the main stream, finalists will be invited to the GLH Finals & Gala, to be held in London in mid-May. On top of that, the overall winner of the GLH Inclusivity Challenge will be invited to present its solution during a diversity and inclusion summit that BCLP is planning to host in September, where leading figures from the industry will be asked to commit to ensuring the idea is brought to life and scaled up to deliver a lasting impact on the legal industry as a whole.

Kearra Markowich, Executive Director of the Global Legal Hackathon, and who is based here in London told us:

“the Global Legal Hackathon is remarkable for the fact that it is a global technology event that is majority women-led around the world.  Women lead the event in Brazil, Israel, Romania, Singapore, the United States, and many other countries. On the occasion of International Women’s Day overlapping with the Global Legal Hackathon, we are thrilled to be joined by women-owned RSG Consulting, She Breaks the Law, and the diversity and inclusion team of BCLP to challenge the world to invent new and novel approaches to increasing equity, diversity, and inclusion in the legal industry.”


We think this is a fantastic addition to what is always a great fun weekend. Follow these links to find out more about:

  • The Inclusivity Challenge
  • The London Edition of GLH2020
  • How to register

We look forward to seeing you in Marylebone!

Share this:

  • Tweet

Filed Under: #GLH2020, artificial intelligence & robotics, blockchain, business innovation, cloud, collaboration, creativity, digital disruption, emerging technologies, ideas, innovation, IoT Tagged With: diversity, Equal Pay, Equal Rights, Equality, Gender, inclusivity, International Women's Day, LGBTQ, women in tech

What do you get when you mix Lawyers, Coders, Marketers, beer and pizza?

February 11, 2020 By David Terrar

What do you get when you mix Lawyers, Coders, Marketers, beer and pizza?

In our experience, the answer is “something special”!  

#GLH2020 #London

Next month the third Global Legal Hackathon is happening over the weekend of 6-8 March in London and simultaneously in over 50 cities across 6 continents.  Back in 2018 40 cities joined in.  Last year we had 47 cities, and this year will be bigger, better and even more fun!  First a disclosure – I’ve been part of the organising team since the start. Actually the idea for this event was formed when Brian Kuhn, who at the time ran IBM’s Watson Legal business, met David Fisher, CEO of Integra Ledger, at a workshop Rob Millard of Cambridge Strategy Group and I ran back in 2017. Rob and I have hosted the London edition of the hackathon ever since, with a lot of help from our friends, sponsors and the University of Westminster. This is a not for profit event, free to enter for all the participants, with our sponsors covering the cost of some prizes, as well as lunches, evening meals, soft drinks, coffee, tea, beer and wine. A hackathon wouldn’t be a hackathon without beer and pizza!

Is a hackathon with lawyers going to work?

We know that the legal profession has a reputation for being conservative and corporate across all sizes of firms, but like every industry sector the profession is facing the need to digitally transform and reinvent (what our friends at Bloor Research would call a Mutable Business™).  New approaches, new uses of technology and, more than anything, new business models are going to be required. Every firm has a position on embracing cloud and mobile technologies, but automation in general and Artificial Intelligence in particular should figure prominently in many plans. This Hackathon is all about getting our best legal brains and innovators in a big room with smart marketers, designers and developers to collaborate, feed off each other’s creativity, experiment, and come up with fresh ideas, cool apps and new ways to interact with clients.  It worked like that in 2018 and 2019 with some great ideas, great teamwork and a lot of fun!

What’s the objective?

To progress the business of law, or to facilitate access to the law for the public.  Ideas will be pitched on the Friday evening, and teams of 3-10 will form to work over the weekend to create an app or a service.  We expect ideas using technologies like AI, Machine Learning, Chatbots, Blockchain, or the Internet of Things. Our 5 judges will deliberate on the Sunday afternoon and pick the winning team for London. That team will enter the virtual semi-finals with all the winners from the other cities on 22 March where 10 teams will be chosen to compete in the grand final in London on 16 May (London venue to be confirmed).

#GLH2020 London is bigger and better

The London stream of the Global Legal Hackathon (GLH) is being co-hosted by Cambridge Strategy Group, Agile Elephant and our venue is kindly provided by the University of Westminster.  This year we are at the Marylebone Campus, 35 Marylebone Street, near Baker Street station.  

All of the details, latest news and how to register are at: LegalHackathon.London and follow #GLH2020 with #London on social media. Attendees will be invited to join our Slack channel to collaborate and communicate in the run up to the physical event.  

Who is involved?

GLH London has only just opened registrations. Last year there were teams from LexisNexis, Pinsent Masons, Vodafone, and Hult International Business School along with involvement from Thomson Reuters, Said Business School, Oxford university, City University, South Bank University and more.

Two of our five judges are on board – Jeanette Nicholas, Deputy Head of Westminster Law School, and Chris Grant, Head of Legal Tech at Barclays (and we hope to announce the other three very soon).  

This year our sponsors are Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner, and White & Case with Global Sponsors to be announced shortly. The Law Society, Disruptive.Live and Techcelerate are supporting us.  techUK and Westminster Council are helping spread the word.  

How can you get involved in the GLH London?

  • Hacker teams and team members – Anyone involved in the law, interested in the law, involved in technology for the law, or general developers, marketers, graphic designers, app designers from any industry sector who want to join the fun. We know some law firms will submit teams, and new teams will form on the first evening around a great idea at the GLH.  We have a particular focus on diversity and inclusion this year (more details on that soon). 
  • Helpers – We need volunteers over the weekend to make it happen and keep everyone happy.
  • Mentors – We need subject matter experts and technologists who can mentor the teams over the weekend to help crystallise their ideas, challenge them, or keep them on track.
  • Judges – We’ve got 2 great judges, but we need to find 3 more.
  • Sponsors – As well as the venue we will be providing food (participants need to tell us if they have any special dietary requirements) and drinks, name tags, other supplies as well as some prizes.   This is a ‘not for profit’ exercise for the hosts, but we need to cover our costs.

If you are reading this and you aren’t near London, Manchester is hosting this year, as are cities in Brazil, Israel, Hungary, China – check out the Global Legal Hackathon site for a city near you.

Like we said at the start, we know this is going to be something special. What’s going to happen when you get a bunch of lawyers, coders, designers, consultants and marketing types with their laptops, toolkits and cloud platforms together over a weekend?  Please come and join us and find out!

Share this:

  • Tweet

Filed Under: artificial intelligence & robotics, blockchain, business innovation, collaboration, creativity, events Tagged With: Agile, AI, big data, blockchain, cloud, creativity, hackathon, innovation, IoT, law, legaltech, ML

Is Blockchain relevant for any Business Model?

August 13, 2018 By David Terrar

Is Blockchain relevant for any Business Model?

We’ve been thinking and talking Blockchain here, trying to pull the reality out from the hype since 2015. Recently I heard a respected colleague suggest that it’s applicable in “less than 1/10 of 1% of corporate processes”. At the other end of the scale it’s going to take over the world. So what’s the reality of blockchain’s relevance to any business model and why? I was recently asked to think about exactly that question as input for a book chapter (that didn’t quite happen), and my brain jumped to both the history of trade, the power dynamics involved and the context. This (chapter length, 20 minute read) article is the result. So let’s get down to business, but let’s go back to where business began in our human history, and think this question through from first principles.

TRADE

Trade. Commerce. We have been exchanging value with goods and services as long as there have been humans. How have the components of trade developed over time, what’s new, and how can blockchain add anything to what we now call the business model? The relevance lies in the basic components of trade and commerce, the ways they have changed, and in turn changed our society over time. In our history new technologies have triggered industrial revolutions, globalisation, and the sheer numbers at play underpin today’s amazing rate of change that informs all business. We live in exponential times.

Look at a timeline of the way trade and commerce have developed since the beginning. Modern humans have been around on the planet for 200,000 years. The start of human civilisation had to wait for the end of the Ice Age 15,000 years ago, and the process really began with the development of agriculture in Turkey around 10,000 years ago. Instead of everyone needing to be hunters or gatherers to find food, we cultivated our own crops and livestock, and that led to food surpluses and the possibility of new roles in our tribes and societies. Some of us could specialise in producing the food, while others could be soldiers, artisans, artists, builders, administrators, priests or priestesses. Urbanisation and the first evidence our archaeologists can find of organised civilisations date from 9000-6000 BC. That is when we see the first evidence of the bazaar, which comes from the Persian word bāzār. Trade began in these marketplaces that started at the edge of our villages, towns and cities, but soon moved to the centre of things. Over time these bazaars formed a network of trading centres to exchange food, goods and information, and those evolved in to our major trading routes.

Initially to trade with each other we developed the system of barter. Introduced by Mesopotamia tribes, adopted by the Phoenicians it spread across the world with trade itself. We exchanged goods and services for other services and goods in return. We traded in food, tea, spices, silks, animal skins, furs and weapons. Valuable commodities like salt or gold were used like currency. Actual currency came in to existence around 600BC when King Alyattes minted the first coins in Lydia, now part of Turkey.

The Silk Road started around 200BC. The most famous and extensive, ancient network of trade routes that connected the East and West through the Middle East and Southern Europe bringing silk and other goods, but also religion, philosophies, culture, ideas and even disease too. By the time of the Roman Empire lenders based in temples made loans, accepted deposits and performed the exchange of money. With the difficulties of financing long-distance trade along these routes, the Hawala system started around the 8th century between Arabic and Muslim traders as a protection against theft. It is a popular and informal value transfer system based not on the movement of currency, but instead on the performance and honour of a huge network of money brokers. The word in Arabic means transfer, or sometimes trust and that’s significant.

Later, Marco Polo travelled this Silk Road from Europe to China and around 1290 he brought back the concept of paper money to Europeans, but it took until 1661 for the first bank notes to be printed in the west in Sweden.

BANKING AND ACCOUNTING FOR TRADE

When it comes to the concept of banking itself, that really started with merchants loaning grain and produce to farmers and traders. That process developed in to what we now know as banking in Italy in the Renaissance in Florence, Venice and Genoa. The Medici bank was established by Giovanni Medici in 1397, and the oldest bank still in existence is Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena which has been operating continuously since 1472.

We also have the Renaissance to thank for the financial bookkeeping practices we still use today. In the 15th Century Luca Pacioli, a friend of Leonardo da Vinci who was also a monk, a mathematician, and an alchemist formally codified the Italian double-entry accounting system known as the Method of the Merchants of Venice. It was the first system that allowed merchants to measure the worth of their business. Pacioli adapted Arabic mathematics to provide a system that could work across all trades and nations. Banking and accounting allowed capitalism to flourish and spread throughout Europe with major centres in Amsterdam and London, and through our trade routes to New York and the rest of the World.

We entered a period great changes. From the Renaissance to the Enlightenment. From the printing press to the first Industrial Revolution. From trade driven colonisation to the globalisation of the world economy that has been happening progressively since that time in the 15th century. All of this fuelled by new technologies and new forms of communication.

GLOBALISATION AND FOUR INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTIONS

The United States had been one of colonies, but by the end of the 19th century it was transforming to become a world power. In 1871 Western Union introduced the first money transfer service, based on its extensive telegraph network. As telecommunications developed in the 20th Century that led to another huge expansion in the banking sector. It accelerated business and markets towards a much more Internationally integrated economy. The first credit card was launched in 1946. Computers and the information technology they support have been developing rapidly since the 50s and 60s to the internet and the world wide web of the 90s. We started talking e-commerce, businesses began to need a website as well as bricks and mortar, and a significant portion of our buying and selling, both business and personal, went online. We’ve been regularly talking about digital since Nicholas Negroponte’s book Being Digital was published in 1995. The World Economic Forum tells us that we are the midst of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. The First Industrial Revolution starting around 1750 using water and steam power to mechanize production. The Second used electric power to create mass production. The Third used electronics and information technology to automate production. The Fourth we are experiencing today is characterised by a fusion of technologies across the physical, the digital and the biological. Every business is considering digitisation, digital transformation, and the way they connect with their customers, partners and suppliers. The businesses that want to survive are looking long and hard at their current business model and considering change before their competitors try and out flank them.

European banks began offering mobile phone banking in 1999, and our debit and credit cards went contactless first in the UK in 2008. During the first two decades of this century, cell phone technology, WiFi, 4G and cloud computing have advanced so that almost anyone in the developed world can afford a smart phone with “always-on” connections that allow us access to apps, maps, the web and social media. In return those devices are helping business track us and our buying behaviours so that we live more interconnected lives than ever. The first purely digital cryptocurrency appeared in 2009, and its underlying technology of blockchain, that is the subject of this post, is moving out of early adopter status to change things again, and dramatically. On top of all of this the rise of the Internet of Things (IoT) means a proliferation of connected devices, autonomous objects and appliances that do our bidding that are all reshaping life as we know it.

BUT WAIT, THERE’S MORE

It took 200,000 years for the World population to reach 1 billion, a milestone we passed in 1804. In 1974 we hit 4 billion. For those of us reading this article born on or before 1974, the population of the world has doubled in our lifetimes as we now approach 8 billion humans on the planet, growing at a rate of 200,000 more each day. Along with the amazing and accelerating advances in technology of the last 50 years, that means more of everything. More ideas. More creativity. More products in more categories. More choice. More competition. More transactions. More mouths to feed and more challenges.

So the exponential times we live in are driving the rate of change even faster. The statistics are staggering. We’ve discussed how trade has moved from barter to use of currencies, with banks and merchants getting involved, although barter is still valid. Our physical marketplaces have connected in to trade routes, evolved, gone global and been supplemented by telecommunications and the online world. What are the other ingredients of trade that we should consider, and how have the power dynamics changed over time?

BALANCING TRUST AND RISK

Back at the bazaar when we are bartering our goods or services, how trustworthy is the person we are trading with? Does that person have any certification or proof that they are legitimately who they are supposed to be? Are the goods or services they are exchanging with us genuine or defective in some way? Are they the age and condition that has been represented to us? The goods may be genuine, but are they actually owned by the seller? Are there any guarantees or warranties if anything goes wrong. Is there some insurance we can buy, or some method we can deploy to assure our goods aren’t stolen? Does the marketplace itself offer us any protection? As buyer and seller we negotiate and eventually agree an exchange of value by handshake or some form of contract, but were the terms of our agreement fair? If currencies were involved was the exchange rate valid for these circumstances, and were those currencies real or counterfeit? How is the exchange between buyer and seller actually executed? Standing face to face in the marketplace we can see each other and exchange our goods or the currency simultaneously, but if there is some production process or a promise of delivery, who will oversee and guarantee the delivery and the payment? Then as products and services get ever more complicated, and as globalisation and communications get involved, all of these issues multiply and extend across the distances involved and each link in the chain of supply from buyer to seller across a network of the intermediary businesses that join the transaction.

The key elements in this trading landscape, from the bazaar to today’s complex, technology driven markets, have always been about balancing trust and risk. Those two are involved at every stage of the process. From the beginning of trade in the bazaar to the present day we have created instruments of trust to help reduce those risks. Each buyer and seller has begun to record their transactions or tracked their assets in their own ledgers or other record keeping systems. We have minted coins and paper money with steps against counterfeiters to certify at least one side of the value exchange. We started to use trusted third parties with their own centralised systems to oversee our business transactions and to become part of the chain. The banks and their banking systems have evolved to help trade, keep our money safe, and they add further instruments to help us like letters of credit. We involve brokers to connect us with sellers, lawyers to oversee our contracts, accountants to keep our books, track our records and other third parties including governments to set, certify and verify the standards and quality of the goods and services we exchange.

All of these parties and the measures they employ reduce risk, but they add costs and inefficiencies across the business network. Each of these intermediaries charge fees for their services. They add steps in to the process, and introduce the possibility of delays in executing agreements or getting things done. They add cost and time with the duplication of effort required to maintain numerous ledgers to keep track of the transactions. They also add additional vulnerabilities. What if a bank or any of the parties’ centralised systems were compromised by fraud, a cyberattack, some system failure or by a simple mistake? The whole business network could be compromised.

CLARIFYING THE BUSINESS MODEL

So what can we do differently with new technology like blockchain? Before we answer that question, let’s explore what we now call the business model. In their 2005 paper Clarifying Business Models: Origins, Present, and Future of the Concept by A. Ostenwalder, Y. Pigneur, and C.L. Tucci, they describe the business model’s place in the firm as the blueprint of how a company does business. It is the translation of strategic issues, such as strategic positioning and strategic goals into a conceptual model that explicitly states how the business functions. Ostenwalder and Pignuer went on to develop their ideas in to their excellent book Business Model Generation. That provides an approach to discussing the business model in 9 components – key partners, key activities, key resources, value propositions, customer relationships, channels, and customer segments, all underpinned by cost structure and revenue streams. Where on this canvas can blockchain be applied to add value, increase efficiency or reduce cost?

THE BLOCKCHAIN GOLD RUSH

Blockchain technology is in the process of moving from early adopter status towards mainstream use but unfortunately, we are in the midst of a “Gold Rush”. There is too much hype and not enough substance in some of the reporting around the topic. Some companies have managed to increase their valuations simply by adding blockchain in to their name!  Beyond today’s heat, or the backlash of bad press it’s likely to cause as some of the current projects and start-ups fail, there is real value to be found “in them thar hills”.  So what can blockchain really do in practice for trade and how is it disruptive?

WHAT IS IT?

A blockchain is a distributed (peer to peer or decentralised) ledger, implemented across many networked servers, consisting of a continuously growing list of records, called blocks, which are linked across the whole network and secured using cryptography. You can have an open network that anyone can join, or more usually in enterprise implementations, a group of partners join an agreed business network. In addition to the ledger, business rules and smart contracts that execute automatically in a transaction, based on one or more conditions, can be built into the platform.

Traditional database technology always has some central party or owner giving access and administration rights that we have to trust to use their ledger. A blockchain ledger has those rights distributed to every node or partner in the network equally. This allows several parties or even competitors to share a trusted digital ledger across the network of computers without the need for any central, controlling authority. A single version of the truth. The combination of the cryptography used to safeguard each block, in conjunction with the fact that each block addition is “witnessed” and instantly replicated across all the servers in the network means that, in practice, no single party has the power or resources to tamper with the records. The ledger becomes immutable.

A few words of caution that we’ve blogged about before. An open blockchain could have any number of servers that all need to replicate every added record simultaneously. That might soak up a lot of computing power and energy, as well as not allowing much of a transaction rate through that ledger. This is exactly why enterprise implementations of blockchain usually deploy a closed or permissioned group of partners in a particular business network. That’s the position today. We’re at an early stage which you could liken to the early days of the Internet and the World Wide Web, but more on that later.

WHAT DOES BLOCKCHAIN SOLVE?

The problem we are solving here is at the core of all trade – trust. Blockchain’s key advantage is that the buyer and seller, the other parties or competitors that are involved can trust the validity of the distributed ledger without the need for any intermediary like a bank or broker or lawyer or government being involved. No reputation required. It eliminates the need for the duplication of effort that always happens amongst the parties involved, and reduces the need for those intermediaries. It changes the backbone of business. This is why the banks and financial institutions have been amongst the first to make big investments in to understanding and developing this new technology. Blockchain has the power to significantly disrupt their core business model as the key intermediary and the central overseer of trade. This is why blockchain developer skills are at a premium.

It is important to note that while blockchains contain transaction data, they are not a complete replacement for the existing database technology, transaction processing or messaging systems that they will always sit alongside and connect to.  Blockchain and the Distributed Ledger concept adds something new.  Blockchains contains verified, immutable proof of transactions or the recording of assets with benefits that extend far beyond those of a traditional database.

WHAT CAN IT DO?

Blockchain means that business networks can be simplified. The end participants in a trade, the buyer and the seller, stay the same but the need for intermediaries can be removed or reduced. The underlying transactional system can change to be simpler, more efficient and more open as all parties can share the same transaction record in the same ledger, rather than having to maintain one of their own. A secure blockchain business network can provide:

  • Enhanced privacy so that only those parties with permission can access the ledger. Depending on the application permissions might be extended to auditors or regulators where appropriate.
  • Improved transparency and auditability as everyone in the business network is working from the same ledger which is a single source of the truth.
  • Increased operational efficiency by removing the traditional extra steps and intermediaries, and streamlining the transfer of the assets and value exchange.

Here are some examples of how blockchain technology is currently in action changing things:

  • In 2006, a USA outbreak of E coli was linked to bagged spinach. It took regulators 2 weeks to conduct the trace back and determine the exact source of the outbreak. The IBM Food Trust network including a consortium of Walmart, Nestle, Unilever and others means that the same trace can now be done in 2.2 seconds.
  • In February 2017 Northern Trust launched the first commercial deployment of blockchain technology for private equity. Audit firms can now carry out audits of private equity lifecycle events directly from the blockchain in real-time.
  • IBM and shipping giant Maersk have formed a joint venture that offers a jointly developed global trade digitization platform built on open standards and designed for use by the entire global shipping ecosystem. It will address the need to provide more transparency and simplicity in the movement of goods across borders and trading zones with the digitisation and automation of paperwork filings for the import and export of goods.
  • Modum is a Swiss company who provide data services for pharmaceutical companies. Their platform uses smart contracts and external IoT sensors to track environmental conditions for pharmaceutical products while in transit to help with regulatory compliance in the European Union, which requires proof that the products were maintained in certain conditions during transport.
  • Spanish bank Santander has become the first company in the world to use blockchain to confirm each shareholder voter’s digital identity and so make it easier and more secure for investors to vote at an annual meeting.

The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) is investigating how blockchain could combat counterfeiting. Estonia was the first government to explore blockchain technology and their e-Estonia programme connects government services in a single digital platform. The USA’s Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced it had signed a two-year joint-development agreement with IBM Watson Health to explore using blockchain to securely share patient data. Dubai wants to become the first government in the world to conduct all of its transactions using blockchain, with a target deadline of 2020. In the UK HM Land Registry is exploring the technology to support their stated aim of digitising and automating 95% of their daily transactions by 2022.

The complication we have today is that not enough of these projects have gone beyond proof of concept to successful, enterprise scale, live solutions.  Since the concept has been around for almost a decade that’s a problem that, collectively, we need to fix.

The potential applications and benefits of blockchain technology apply across all business sectors, and each area of the business model canvas. It can help simplify international payments in banking, or clearing and settlement in financial markets. It could revolutionise land registry for individuals and governments, or access to medical data for health and life sciences. It can improve traceability in the supply chain and asset tracking, both physical and digital, across a whole host of industries or government applications. Secure digital identity will have huge ramifications for fraud prevention, compliance and for the provision of government services.

Land ownership, intellectual property and the role of the trusted intermediary mean that the legal profession is interested too. On top of the implications of the immutable ledger, smart contracts can be encoded in the blockchain technology. Clauses can be made partially or fully self-executing, self-enforcing, or both. The purpose (and potential) is to provide superior security compared to traditional contract law while reducing the cost and time associated with creating, agreeing and executing traditional contracts. Like the banks the major law firms are looking at their current business models and client relationships, looking for new ways of unlocking value, and so they are investing and exploring the possibilities too.

CONCLUSION

We asked where on the business model canvas can blockchain be applied, and the answer is in all 9 segments. It can be used to change the relationships you have with your customers, suppliers and channel partners. Companies will need to rethink their traditional business processes and change from business as usual to harness the efficiencies and the values blockchain can release, but we need to recognise that blockchain is evolving. As we said earlier, this is like the early stage of the Internet in the 90s. Back then it was a time of huge potential, rapid change with factors most organisations were only beginning to understand. At the start the scope was limited and the user experience was clunky. Major players in the sector like Google or Facebook didn’t exist or what they do wasn’t even conceived of as being useful yet. Fast forward to now and the Internet and these companies are part of the fabric of every day life, business and personal. Today we are still at that early stage in the development of blockchain’s distributed ledger capabilities, with technical solutions to questions we haven’t even asked yet still in the future, but not far away. Relevant to your business model? Relevant to trade? Trust me, take it seriously and factor it in to your transformation planning.

Challenge me if you disagree.  Contact us if you want to talk blockchain, business transformation and digital enablement.

Share this:

  • Tweet

Filed Under: blockchain, digital disruption, future

Making Sense of Blockchain for Business Leaders – Workshop 23 May 2018

April 10, 2018 By Alan Patrick

Making Sense of Blockchain for Business Leaders – Workshop 23 May 2018

techUK  23 May 2018, start 8.30 for 9am, finish 1 pm

Join us for a half day workshop taking you beyond the hype and beyond the theory, so you can really decide what works, what doesn’t, and how to plan effective use of blockchain for your company.

We have been tracking the Bitcoin/blockchain environment for many years, (read our blog here and here for most recent blockchain related work) and earlier this year we have co-organised the Global Legal Hackathon London event . We will share our primary research into who is really using blockchain, and for what. Just like Jimmy John Shark, we will also look at how the major blockchain technology models work, the economics of blockchain operation, how it stacks up against competing technologies and likely evolution. We plan to tackle the following topics over the morning:

8.30 – 9 am – Arrival, coffee and tea

9.00 – 10.45  Briefing session

  • What blockchain is, what it isn’t – getting underneath the hype to the nuts and bolts
  • Why is it transformational, and where – what industries will it affect?
  • Explaining smart contracts, cryptocurrencies, ICOs (and how to avoid the hype about them)
  • How and where is blockchain currently being used in reality? A summary of case studies
  • What implementations and frameworks exist and should be considered?
  • What does the future for blockchain look like?

10.45 – 11.15 Break – Drinks, Biscuits and Networking

11.15 – 1 pm Workshop session

  • Hands on the technology with a blockchain sandbox
  • Brainstorm potential use and use cases for your company
  • Fitting blockchain into your strategic plan

The event will be informal, with plenty of opportunities for Q&A, followed by light lunch & networking.

Depending on numbers, we will either include a hands on session with a blockchain sandbox or a demo of how it is set up and operates.  Please bring your MacBook or Laptop if you want to get hands on.

Booking Prices

Early Bird (until April 30th) £125

Full Price £200

Group Price 2 or more £150 each

Go to Eventbrite to book (link below)

Book a Blockchain Workshop ticket

Venue:

techUK,
2nd Floor
10 St Bride Street
London, EC4A 4AD

How to find techUK

This event is kindly supported by Ctrl O, developer of Linkspace, a cloud-based, low-code data management application.

Share this:

  • Tweet

Filed Under: blockchain, events

We love the smell of Blockchain in the morning

March 12, 2018 By David Terrar

We love the smell of Blockchain in the morning

Like napalm, blockchain is a portmanteau word, and you just have to sniff to sense how pervasive it is becoming in emerging technology conversations across the business landscape.  It’s a technology that’s on the lips of VCs, strategists and industry watchers talking about their next big idea and often framed as the next stage of evolution of the Internet.  A word that appears in the first sentence of the elevator pitch of many new technological ideas or solutions.  Does it need to be there or is it some pivot to hook on to the latest trend? A Techcrunch piece last month started with:

“Demand is off the charts for blockchain talent, and the capital is waiting to back it up. More than $3.7 billion has been raised through ICOs in the United States alone.”

Here we are less than 3 months in to 2018 and several days in to the the usual hype and excitement that surrounds the eclectic SXSW “technology meets entertainment” event currently going on in Austin, Texas, and I’m wondering whether this is an emerging technology that can be a force for good, or something that will take us to the heart of darkness.

We’ve been here before
This period in the blockchain hype cycle feels a lot like when we started talking Software as a Service in the mid 2000s and then Cloud Computing back in 2007.  Those of us there at the start of solutions based on SaaS (along with infrastructure and platforms as a service) worried about every provider with a hosted solution of some kind slapping on ‘aaS’ initially and then the ‘Cloud’ label to their offerings to ride the wave, and we had endless discussion and argument around what was “pure cloud” and what was “same old software as a service”.  We came up with definitions and tried to apply standards and it got messy.  In moving beyond the regular misuse and misunderstanding of the term, though, cloud computing became a useful catch all for the paradigm shift that was happening around us – the consumerization and commoditisation of IT services as part of the “Big Shift” and a core component of what Agile Elephant calls the Digital Enterprise Wave.  Blockchain’s following a similar course in much choppier waters.

Last week Adrianne Jeffries’ piece on The Verge worries that the blockchain term has become so widespread and misused that it’s quickly losing meaning, quoting David Gerard, author of Attack of the 50 Foot Blockchain: Bitcoin, Blockchain, Ethereum & Smart Contracts, saying in an email:

“What is a ‘blockchain’? The word is a buzzword that is increasingly ill-defined,”

He has a point.  Some people know what they are talking about, but when others say blockchain do the really just mean a secure, distributed database of some kind?  There is both bad and good information on this, with bad and good definitions out there.  For example, when I was researching this article I found a Fortune/Bloomberg piece from last December titled Blockchain Is Pumping New Life Into Old-School Companies Like IBM and Visa, that contains the sentence: “The blockchain can also hold many more documents and data than traditional database storage, allowing for more nuanced insights and analysis.”  Now that’s rubbish on many levels, and dangerous too.

We need some clarity
That’s exactly why I’ll try to explain what blockchain is by answering the question “what’s the difference between a blockchain and a traditional database?”.  As well as following my explanation, I want to refer you to three sources.  Please read CEO of Integra Ledger, David Fisher’s excellent guest post on Artificial Lawyer – What Really Is Blockchain and Why Does It Matter to Lawyers?  Also read Shaan Ray’s Blockchains versus Traditional Databases, and finally here on the AE blog, Alan Patrick’s Blockchain Economics – the Reality. Can your application afford the transaction costs?

What is blockchain?
A blockchain is a distributed (or decentralised) ledger, implemented across many networked servers, consisting of a continuously growing list of records, called blocks, which are linked across the whole network and secured using cryptography.  This technology allows several parties or competitors to share a digital ledger across the network of computers without the need for a central authority.  The combination of cryptography and the fact that each block addition is “witnessed” across many servers means that, in practice, no single party has the power or resources to tamper with the records.  The problem we are solving here is trust.  Blockchain’s key advantage is that the parties or competitors can trust the digital ledger without the need for any intermediary like a bank or broker or lawyer or government being involved.  How disruptive is that!

What’s the difference between a blockchain and a traditional database?
Traditional databases are based on CRUD.  No, not rubbish, but the concept that somebody has the ability to write a program that creates, reads, updates or deletes individual records in a database sitting on storage connected to a central server somewhere. Somebody has the administration rights for that database.  Depending on the particular database technology and the way the software accessing it is designed, any changes might be tracked by who made the change, date and time stamped, and then duplicated somewhere else for backup and recovery purposes.  You can use all sorts of security measures and cryptography to protect the integrity of the data, but two things remain true.   First, some one person or central authority has administration rights to keep the data secure and control access on everyone’s behalf.  Second, the individual records in the database can be changed.  If a malicious agent wants to beat the cyber security measures put in place so that they can hack the data, they have one place to work and do their dirty work.

Blockchain databases consist of several, distributed compute server and storage nodes, all of which participate in the administration and verification of the data all of the time.  Instead of CRUD, blockchain technology can only create and read.  Somebody writing the program to use this kind of database can only read existing blocks and add or append additional blocks.  The blockchain technology performs only two functions – the validation of existing transactions and the addition of new ones.  All of the nodes in the network are capable of adding new blocks.  All of the nodes of the network verify every existing and new block.  That means that the malicious agent who wants to beat the cryptographic encryption needs to do that simultaneously on all the nodes of the network, making it so difficult and expensive in compute power (with current technology) as to be impossible in practice.  That’s why this form of distributed ledger technology can be considered immutable.  That’s why you can trust a blockchain ledger.

What works, what doesn’t, what’s next?
As Alan’s post here on the Agile Elephant blog highlighted there are places where this technology is appropriate and works well.  What is worrying is that not everyone is understanding or considering the compute power required by the distributed blockchain model where every add must be verified across all of the nodes of the network, and that has an effect on the rate of transactions you can put through this type of database compared to a traditional centralised one.  There are a lot of applications currently being suggested for blockchain that won’t be able to cope with that operational and economic overhead.  Alan puts it succinctly when he suggests:

“Somewhere between the hype, hope and heuristics is a major disconnect”

So what happens next and can blockchain be a force for good?  To answer that question I asked our good friend, author, fintech expert and entrepreneur Dinis Guarda.  Dinis and I both lecture on Groupe INSEEC’s digital marketing MBA programme.  Back in September 2016 he spoke on IoT and Blockchain at one of Agile Elephant’s regular meetup sessions, explaining his belief that blockchain in the IoT will not be implemented without significant platform development by companies with deep pockets.  Then at the Enterprise Digital Summit Paris in 2017 he keynoted on “Blockchain and the Decentralisation of Business”.  He’s considered one of the top blockchain and cryptography influencers in the world, and most recently his company Ztudium sold their blockchain and cryptocurrency with rewards tokenization platform called Blockimpact to Canadian firm Glance Technologies.  Glance owns and operates Glance Pay, a streamlined mobile payment system, and Dinis is now on their advisory board.  Talking to him around blockchain he recognises that, like any tool, it can be used for good and bad, but it needs to be understood and a lot of work needs to be done on the scalability of the technology.

Actually, Dinis is just about to publish his next book titled “Blockchain, AI and Crypto Economics – The Next Tsunami?”.  We’ll be reporting from the book launch next month.  If you want to get a flavour for what Dinis will be saying, go to this Slideshare from one of his recent presentations.  Dinis argues that these emerging technologies are turning the wave in to a veritable tsunami.  He suggests that we are just in the early stages of the digitalisation and disruption of the financial industry.  These new digital models of decentralised and distributed finance and economics can impact society in both positive and negative ways.  Dinis explains:”

“Governments, regulators and financial institutions need to consider these decentralised models to enhance industry resilience, integrity and work in governance structures while using data driven technologies to leverage this.  Crypto economics models need to to be at the centre of any government, financial organisation or regulator, and by chain effect, any business.”

Dinis’s next venture has very positive intentions around life sciences and healthcare and will pull all of this technology together with artificial intelligence and data analysis using a proprietary peer to peer network.  It’s called Lifesci.  He couldn’t tell me much about it yet, but we’ll be watching closely and reporting when we can.  Expect more when the new book comes out in a few weeks, and we’ll be finding and writing about good use cases over the coming months.  Please contact us if you’ve got any good suggestions or want to find out more.

(Header image frame grab from the excellent Apocalypse Now, copyright Omni Zoetrope United Artists)

Share this:

  • Tweet

Filed Under: blockchain, digital disruption, finance

London was part of the largest Legal Hackathon ever

March 6, 2018 By David Terrar

London was part of the largest Legal Hackathon ever

It’s been just over a week since the London stream of the Global Legal Hackathon, and those of us who were involved are still feeling the buzz. Here’s a full report of what went on. This was round one of a process which found a London winner to go forward with 39 other city winners from 20 countries, and 1 winner from a remote Hackathon stream too. The aim was to be as open and inclusive as possible, to make this the largest legal hackathon ever!

Globally more than 5000 people participated over the weekend of 23-25 February, generating more than 1000 new legal tech ideas. The 41 winners can improve their entries within agreed guidelines up to the deadline for round two which takes place on March 11th & 12th. Then 10 finalists will be chosen for round three, and funded to attend and the gala final, taking place in New York on April 21st.

Why run a Legal Hackthon?
It’s all about experimentation and innovation. We introduced what #GLH2018 #London was all about in our earlier posts. The goal was to apply innovative ideas and emerging (or any) technologies to progress the business of law or facilitate access to justice for the public. We knew that getting lawyers, coders, designers, marketers, analysts and other business people together over a weekend with beer and pizza was going to make things happen.

So what did happen that weekend?
Something special. On 23rd February, the Friday evening in London we had around 60 people (from 102 registered participants including helpers, mentors and judges) – some were partially formed teams, and many participants were coming along with an idea or some skills, energy and enthusiasm to add in to the pot. Of our participants who stayed the course till Sunday evening, what we didn’t realise until I asked the question in the final presentation session, was that around 2/3 had never participated in a Hackathon before! In Pinsent Masons‘ excellent auditorium, after setting the scene, explaining the timing, the rules, and the Judging Rubric, people started pitching ideas. Actually we started with just 3 good ideas. Then after a worryingly long pause and some discussion the ideas really began to flow. We ended up with 13 really interesting possibilities. We stopped for Dominos Pizza (who weren’t a sponsor, but maybe next year?). Pizza is the life blood of any Hackathon. Straight afterwards we got back in to the auditorium to try to facilitate some version of team speed dating. Actually, following a little encouragement, some of the ideas joined together or were dropped and we coalesced in to 6 teams, each with a strong proposition and a balanced set of skills. Pretty much everybody stayed until 21:00 when we closed the building.

A surprisingly large numbers of team members rejoined us for 8:00 the next morning when we moved to Pinsent Masons luxurious client centre on the 14th floor. More team members arrived during the day – we actually had capacity for 13 teams in 13 separate rooms, thanks to our gracious hosts! 5 teams each grabbed a room for home base, and our 6th team met somewhere else with their developers in the morning, but joined us in the client centre mid afternoon.

Of the 6 lifts you can take to get up and down the Pinsent Masons building, lift D is by far the best choice if you can get it. It’s all glass, running on the outside of the building, and they call it the James Bond lift because it briefly appears in a scene in Skyfall! Fantastic views over London. With that lift, those views and the client centre, this was very definitely “not your average Hackathon”!

Rob Millard and I raided a local Marks & Spencer for sandwiches, nibbles, beer, wine and soft drinks. Actually we totally cleared them out of every variety of bottled beer they had in their fridge – not many regular customers expected in the City of London on a weekend. Sandwiches for lunch. More Dominos Pizza for our evening meal, made even more tasty with the addition of beer and wine (and soft drinks). However, it was notable that our teams were careful with their alcohol intake. We saw people refusing a second beer and heading back to their team rooms – there’s dedication! Yet again they all worked until 21:00 when we had to finally kick them out.

We had the same early start of 8:00 for Sunday with the same early arrivals, a different sandwich selection from Sainsburys and Tescos for lunch, and plenty of drinks and nibbles left for the early evening session. There was a lot of mentor interaction during the day, with teams getting input, asking questions, getting guidance on the approach for their presentations. Soon after lunch you could see some teams rehearsing their story as other teams madly tried to get everything finished by the 16:00 “down tools” deadline.

The Teams
Here are the 6 London teams:

LiP-Sync Toks Hussain
Keith Hardie
Yee Mun Ooi
Ian Broom
James Kingston
Julie Gottlieb
Alex Goff
Mariela Petsova
LightningWarriors George Norfolk
James Turner
Elma Gakenyi
Ben Babbik
Thomas Pauls
Jon Wilks
Team Pinsent Masons Orlando Conetta
Michael Bell
Ben Cooper
Michael Bell
Alisha Kouser
Olivia Irrgang
smartcomms.ai  Rosemary Martin
Philip Fumey
Martin Kath
Lyle Ellis
Steven Jebb
Olaseni Odebiyi
Christopher Rawlings
RegChain Alkesh Acharya
Fraser Matcham
plus 2
Legalytics Murtaza Amirali
Dr. Mehmood Hassan
Ashok Panchabakesan
Mohamed Sajeed Hameed

Our Judges and Mentors
Our judges were Christina Blacklaws, Deputy Vice President of the Law Society, Frank Jennings the “Cloud Lawyer”, Joanna Goodman, writer/editor and columnist for the Law Society Gazette, and Dr Richard Sykes chair of the Cloud Industry Forum.

Our mentors, to advise and keep the teams on track were Sophia Adams-Bhati, Richard Tromans, Andy Unger, Kim Silver, Silvia Cambie, Jelena Madir, Robert Marcus, Dennis Howlett, Maeve Lavelle, Alan Patrick, Janet Parkinson, Rob Millard and me. Amy Braunz of Integra Ledger joined us for Sunday too.

A very big thank you to all of our judges and mentors who gave up valuable time over a weekend to join the fun. This whole exercise was not-for-profit, only made possible by these people volunteering, our host providing the space free, and our sponsors paying to feed us.

Who was supporting this?
Here are those vital London Sponsors and Supporters we need to thank for making all of this possible!  Cambridge Strategy Group, the Agile Elephant Team, and Pinsent Masons were co-hosts (and by the way, the venue was fantastic!).  We mustn’t forget IBM and Microsoft who provided developers some free access to their cloud platforms. LexisNexis, JG Consulting, Sales Filter, Durham Law School and  The Law Society, were our local sponsors. The Society for Computers and Law, and Disruptive.Live were supporting us too.

I must also thank Indi Shinji, Pinsent Masons events coordinator.  She did a fantastic job all weekend keeping us happy, keeping an unruly bunch of hackers compliant with PM health and safety, and keeping her cool as she accommodated our various and unusual demands.  She was brilliant.

The Global sponsors across all three rounds are Integra, IBM Watson Legal, the Global Legal Blockchain Consortium, Cadence, LawDroid and ONE400

The Presentations
As soon as everyone managed to get down from the 14th floor, a little before 16:15 on Sunday we assembled back in the auditorium for our 6 presentations. The sequence had been chosen fairly by drawing lots. Each team had a strict 10 minutes and no more, plus 5 minutes of Q&A from our 4 judges, sitting on stage at the top table. Even with the handovers and usual audio visual problems of hooking up a variety of different laptops for presenting demos, prototypes and slides (that suddenly freeze, or won’t connect) we got through all 6 sessions well inside the allotted 2 hours. I must thank Nathan the Pinsent Masons AV guy who made it happen, recorded and live streamed it all for us (we’ll publish video soon).  diginomica live streamed the sessions on Facebook Live too.   It’s important to note that this wasn’t a “PowerPoint off”, as prototypes and real code were on show, as well as the slides to tell their stories.

Frank Jennings’ post summarises the ideas from our 4 “third” placed teams more succinctly than I could:

“One team proposed the use of machine learning to help users to prioritise and process their emails. There was a GDPR toolkit for small-medium sized organisations. Another was a dashboard collating billing info, time, indexing and work location data. And there was a blockchain application to help with conveyancing.”

Managing to finish the show and tell before 18:00 gave our judges a little extra time to come up with a winner and a runner-up, which head judge Christina Blacklaws duly announced.

It’s notable that none of our 6 teams were reinventing the wheel. Even the team who were tackling the common problem of email and information overload for lawyers had innovative ideas using machine learning to address the problem.

The Winners!
You might have seen the announcements already, but our London winners were:

The runner-up was LiP-Sync:
An app with chat interface using IBM’s natural language processing, sentiment analysis and Watson to help those going through a divorce without legal representation.

The London winner was Team Pinsent Masons:
A blockchain enabled tool to manage workflow in developing ideas for new innovations to fully formed business propositions and for partners to vote on which ideas should receive investment. The tool could also be used for partners to quickly and easily vote on other issues too, making it easier to engage them as business owners and enhance governance.

The Blockchain issue
Agile Elephant’s position on blockchain technology is well known. We worry about the hype and fashion element associated with many of the startups and ideas out there. We worry about a lack of understanding of where blockchain is and isn’t an appropriate solution and the real cost of a transaction using this technology. However, there are a growing number of real use cases and sensible applications, like many that we’ve seen across this Hackathon. We’ll be writing another post specifically on this issue, and I recommend you read CEO of Integra Ledger, David Fisher’s excellent guest post on the Artificial Lawyer making the case for Blockchain and the Law.

Other posts about #GLH2018 #GlobalLegalHack
Here is a selection of posts we could find about the Hackathon.

Here’s a great piece from Dennis Howlett, founder of diginomica, on the event and his experience as a mentor (and I particularly like his takedown of the “armchair quarterback”):

Lawyers and code – who’da thunk? Yet Global Legal Hackathon hailed as success

Frank’s view as a judge:

Hacking legal tech in London

From the Law Society Gazette:

Host team Pinsent triumphs in global legal hackathon

Richard Sykes column on Horizon Business Innovation:

Global Legal Hackathon is Practical and Relevant

Orlando Connetta of the winning team explains their solution:

The Power of Play – Our experience at the Global Legal Hackathon

A great post from Britton Guerrina of PwC on….

Why lawyers should do hackathons

Thomson Reuters on the IP issue with this and other hackathons:

Observations from the Global Legal Hackathon 2018: The Communal Dimension of Intellectual Property

Artificial Lawyer announces the winner, and then broadens it out, listing all of the 40 City winners:

Pinsent Masons Team Wins London Leg of Global Legal Hackathon 2018

And the Worldwide GLH 2018 Winners Are….

I’m expecting a column on #GLH2018 from Joanna Goodman, and other posts too.  As those get published or we find more, I’ll update this post and add them here.

Conclusion
We all had a blast! Some really great ideas have started on a journey that we hope they complete to become products in the wild. Our friends running the Global event tell us they are delighted with all the feedback they got from London, and we know that it was the trending topic in legal tech last weekend. We’ll carry out a survey of our own with all actual participants, as well as registered attendees who downloaded the app but didn’t make it to the venue. We hope to find out what worked, what didn’t and what we should do next year. And yes, there will be a next year! The GLH organisers want to make this an annual event, as well as running other activities for the legal tech community too. We’ll certainly be doing that and in 2019 with our co-hosts for the UK too. Watch this space!

If you attended, were watching on social media, or just want to give us some feedback, please add a comment below or contact us.

Update 

Keith Hardie quite rightly pointed out I’d missed some of the members of the LiP-Sync team.  Apologies, but they’ve been added back.  Also I’ve added more post links (on IP at hackathons, a column by one of our judges, one on why lawyers should do hackathons) – more of those soon as I see them.

Share this:

  • Tweet

Filed Under: artificial intelligence & robotics, blockchain, business innovation, events, ideas, innovation

Global Legal Hackathon in London this weekend – an update

February 21, 2018 By David Terrar

Global Legal Hackathon in London this weekend – an update

What happens when you get a bunch of lawyers, coders, designers, consultants and marketing types with their laptops and cloud platforms together over a weekend?  Well, we think it will turn in to something special!

Just over 3 weeks ago Agile Elephant volunteered, along with  Cambridge Strategy Group and Pinsent Masons to host the London stream the Global Legal Hackathon (GLH). We mean this weekend, 2 days time on February 23-25 at Pinsent Masons’ london office in the City.  A winner will be declared for London on Sunday and that team will go through to a global competition with all the other cities, culminating with a winner announced at a banquet in New York on April 21.  This will be the world’s largest legal hackathon happening simultaneously in over 40 cities and 20 countries.

All of the details and how to register are at: LegalHackathon.London

It’s been a mad 3 weeks getting our act together, using social media to connect and get the message out.  Our friends at diginomica have written about it this way:

Law firm Pinsent Masons hosts upcoming Global Legal Hackathon London

Over on CompareTheCloud I did this guest post:

Join the World’s Largest Legal Hackathon this weekend

The Law Sites blog has thrown down a worthy gauntlet and challenged us to change the world for the better with:

With ‘Hadfield Challenges,’ Global Legal Hackathon Urges Participants to Address ‘Problems Worth Solving’

But just in case you haven’t seen the details, here is what it’s all about and where we are at with 2 days to go.

What is the goal of a team entering the GLH?
The goal is to apply innovative ideas and emerging technologies to progress the business of law or facilitate access to justice for the public.  Teams of 3 to 6 will come up with a prototype or proposal at the end of the hackathon to present in front of a panel of judges.  We expect ideas using technologies like AI, Machine Learning, Chatbots, Blockchain, or the Internet of Things.

Where and when?
At Pinsent Masons office at 30 Crown Place, Earl Street, London EC2A 4ES, (including their client centre on the 15th floor with stunning views over London) over the weekend of February 23-25.  18:00 start on Friday, working all day Saturday and most of Sunday, judging takes place from 16:00-18:00 on Sunday and a winner will be announced before 19:00.

Who are the Judges and Mentors?

Our judges are Christina Blacklaws, Deputy Vice President of the Law Society, Frank Jennings the “Cloud Lawyer”, and Dr Richard Sykes chair of the Cloud Industry Forum and Joanna Goodman, Author and IT columnist for the Law Society Gazette.

Our mentors, to help advise and keep the teams on track include Sophia Adams-Bhati, Julie Gottlieb, Richard Tromans, Silvia Cambie, Dennis Howlett, Alan Patrick, Janet Parkinson, Rob Millard and me.

Who is supporting this?

There are a lot of people to thank!  IBM and Microsoft are providing developers some free access to their cloud platforms.  LexisNexis & JG Consulting are our local sponsors.  The Law Society, the Society for Computers and Law and Disruptive.Live are supporting us too.  The Global sponsors are  Integra, IBM Watson Legal, the Global Legal Blockchain Consortium, Cadence, LawDroid and ONE400

Who will be Hacking?

We’ve got teams entered from LexisNexis, Pinsent Masons, Vodafone, and Hult International Business School.  Other participants are coming from IBM, Fliplet, Jurit LLP, Hook Tangaza, Sumitomo Electric Finance UK, Said Business School, Legalytics, Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr Inc, The Incorporated Council of Law Reporting for England and Wales, European Banking Authority, The Founder, Legal Utopia, The Law Society, Bryan Cave, Queen Mary University, Thomson Reuters, Kitmobs, Look, YADA Events, Teal Legal, Bank of America Merrill Lynch, City University, Oxford University, and Westminster University.  We’ve got capacity for 110 and 12 teams, but we still need more participants to sign up.

How can you get involved in the GLH?

  • Hacker teams and team members – Anyone involved in the law, interested in the law, involved in technology for the law, or coders and technologists who want to join the fun.  We know some firms will submit teams, and other teams will form around a great idea at the GLH.
  • Helpers – We need volunteers over the weekend to make it happen and keep everyone happy.
  • Mentors – We need subject matter experts and technologists who can mentor the teams over the weekend to help crystallise their ideas, challenge them, or keep them on track.
  • Judges – We’ve got 3 great judges, but may add 1 or 2 more.
  • Sponsors – As well as the venue we will be providing food and drinks, name tags and supplies.  We may even add a main prize and additional prizes.  We need sponsors interested in helping us fund all of this – modest amounts in the range £250-500.  This is a ‘not for profit’ exercise for the hosts, but we need to cover our costs (mostly pizza and drinks).

Follow us on Social Media
We will use social media hashtags #GlobalLegalHack & #GLH2018.  Follow the GLH on Twitter at @WorldHackathon and the London organisers @robmillard & @DT.  GLH have also partnered with legal media sources  ArtificialLawyer.com and Legal Talk Network.  Our friends at Disruptive.Live will be generating video and live content and diginomica and the Law Society Gazette will be reporting on the event.

We want to have fun, and really make a difference for the legal profession.  Will we?   Please come and join us and find out!

Share this:

  • Tweet

Filed Under: blockchain, business innovation, creativity, design thinking, digital disruption, events, future

Get involved in the Global Legal Hackathon in London

February 11, 2018 By David Terrar

Get involved in the Global Legal Hackathon in London

You will have heard that Cambridge Strategy Group, Agile Elephant and Pinsent Masons are the joint team hosting the London event for the world’s largest legal hackathon – the Global Legal Hackathon (GLH) on February 23-25.  A winner will be declared for London and that team will go through to a global competition, culminating with a winner announced at a banquet in New York on April 21.

Here is an update of where we are at so far.

First, two of the founders of the GLH, David Fisher, the CEO of Integra Ledger, and Aileen Schultz, their Director of Network Intelligence,  introduce the Hackathon in this video:

Next, we’ve created a new site with all of the London specific details at LegalHackathon.London where you can register for the event, and find out the ways you can enter a team, become a helper, a mentor or one of our sponsors:

 

Lastly, we can report that the word is spreading, and we have a steady flow of registered participants.  We’ve got teams from Pinsent Masons, and LexisNexis (who are also our first local sponsor), as well as sign ups from Vodafone Group, Hook Tangaza, Legal Utopia, Bryan Cave, JG Consultants, City University, Thomson Reuters, Bank of America Merrill Lynch, YADA Events, FromCounsel, Jurit, Mills & Reeve, Fliplet, and Westminster University.  On top of those there are a number of organisations who’ve committed to be involved but haven’t registered yet.  Microsoft are supporting us with free access to the Azure platform for developers, and IBM will be giving us access to their technology too.  More technology partners will be announced soon.

Our friends at diginomica and the Artificial Lawyer will be coming along to report from the event, and we have teamed up with Disruptive.Live to produce video content and live streams.

Watch out for more news and announcements in the coming week.

Register for London

Find out about London

The Global Event

Share this:

  • Tweet

Filed Under: artificial intelligence & robotics, blockchain, digital disruption, emerging technologies, events, innovation

We want you for the Global Legal Hackathon in London!

February 2, 2018 By David Terrar

We want you for the Global Legal Hackathon in London!

Agile Elephant are proud to be joining Cambridge Strategy Group and Pinsent Masons as the joint team hosting the London event for the world’s largest legal hackathon – the Global Legal Hackathon on February 23-25.  It’s only 3 weeks away, and we need your help!  We need hacker teams and team members, helpers for the weekend to make it happen, mentors to advise the teams and keep them on track, and sponsors to help cover the costs – this is a not for profit initiative for the 3 host companies involved, and we are delighted to be supported by the Law Society too.

So what is this thing all about?  Let me explain….

What is the Global Legal Hackathon?
The Global Legal Hackathon (GLH) is happening simultaneously over the weekend of February 23-25 in more than 40 cities, across 6 continents.  The purpose is the rapid development of solutions to improve the legal industry using innovative ideas and emerging technologies like Artificial Intelligence, Blockchain, or the Internet of Things.  The GLH will engage law schools, law firms and in-house departments, legal technology companies, governments, and service providers to the legal industry across the globe.

What is a Hackathon?
A hackathon is a competition where multi-disciplinary teams come together to collaborate, build and launch mobile or web apps aimed at solving a particular problem. They usually work in small groups over a couple of days.  People can come individually or as a team, with an existing idea to pitch, or to listen and join one of the teams that will be formed at the start of the event.  The goal is to come up with a prototype or proposal at the end of the hackathon to present in front of a panel of judges.

In our case teams will be a minimum of 3 and a suggested maximum of 6.  Anyone has the chance to pitch an idea at the start of the event on Friday evening, teams will be formed, they’ll work over the weekend, and then present to the judges at the end of the weekend.  A winner will be declared for London and that team will go through to a global competition, culminating with a winner announced at a banquet in New York on April 21.

It is a competition, but we aim to be inclusive.  All teams must be willing to accept individual participants on the first day of the event.

What is the goal of a team entering the GLH?
The goal is to apply innovative ideas and emerging technologies to progress the business of law or facilitate access to justice for the public.

Who is organising the London GLH?
The London event is being organised by Cambridge Strategy Group, Agile Elephant, and Pinsent Masons who are kindly providing the venue at 30 Crown Place, Earl Street, London EC2A 4ES.

Who is behind the GLH?
The GLH is being organised globally by Integra, IBM Watson Legal, the Global Legal Blockchain Consortium, Cadence and ONE400.

Who are the judges for the London GLH?
We are assembling a balanced team of 5 judges, which we hope to announce soon.

How do I get involved in the GLH?
It’s free to get involved – go to GlobalLegalHackathon.com and register.  Then download the Cadence event app to your phone and complete your profile.  To find the app on the app store, it is best to search for Cadence and events.  We will use a mix of email, the Cadence app, social media and our various websites to make announcements and keep you posted on our progress.

In what ways can I get involved in the GLH?
We need:

  • Hacker teams and team members – Anyone involved in the law, interested in the law, involved in technology for the law, or coders and technologists who want to join the fun.  We know some firms will submit teams, and other teams will form around a great idea at the GLH.
  • Helpers – We need volunteers over the weekend of February 23-25 to make it happen and keep everyone happy.
  • Mentors – We need subject matter experts and technologists who can mentor the teams over the weekend to help crystallise their ideas, challenge them, or keep them on track.
  • Judges – We are assembling a balanced team of 5 (don’t call us, we’ll call you).
  • Sponsors – As well as the venue we will be providing food and drinks, name tags and supplies.  We may even add a main prize and additional prizes.  We need sponsors interested in helping us fund all of this.  This is a ‘not for profit’ exercise for the hosts, but we need to cover our costs.

Who do I contact if I want to participate or help?
Get in touch with Rob Millard or David Terrar, but please register, download Cadence to your phone and then you will be able to message us directly through the app.

How do I make a noise about this?
We will be broadcasting on social media channels using the hashtags #GlobalLegalHack & #GLH2018.  Follow the GLH on Twitter at @WorldHackathon and follow the London organisers at @robmillard & @DT.  GLH have also partnered with legal media sources  ArtificialLawyer.com and Legal Talk Network.

Where do I find out more?
All of the detail about the event including the judging rubric, event schedule, the other cities and companies involved and more can be found at GlobalLegalHackathon.com, where you will find guidance for attendees, guidance for hosts, or just ask.

We’re really looking forward to it!

UPDATE:

The London stream of the GLH now has its own website at LegalHackathon.London

Share this:

  • Tweet

Filed Under: artificial intelligence & robotics, blockchain, business innovation, digital disruption, emerging technologies, events, future

January 25, 2018 By Alan Patrick

Blockchain Economics – the Reality. Can your application afford the transaction costs?

The last time we looked at Blockchain economics was in late 2016 in one of our meetups when Dinis Guarda presented a paper on its likely evolution in the IoT space (see summary over here). Since then we were asked to look at how blockchain may be used in specific industries, in this case professional services.

I won’t go into the specifics of how blockchain works (it’s in the article about Dinis I linked to above) but it is worth summarising the plusses and minuses of blockchain here:

Good News:

  • Highly Distributed – uses a highly meshed network which increases system resilience
  • High degree of inbuilt security – chained blocks of transactions and the logic of nodes agreeing transactions before being confirmed can survive many hacks to a system
  • The very high level of cryptography used (the “Hashing” calculations) puts a high load on anyone wishing to hack the system by brute force. You can click here to get various security solutions for protecting your confidential data.
  • This Distributed architecture means you don’t need a centralised Hub to run it, or to have a trusted central party.

Bad News

However, as with all engineering, everything is a trade-off – cost vs. capability, security vs. speed, network resilience vs. network operation load, etc.  And blockchain cannot avoid this, its benefits bring problems:

  • Highly Distributed hits system scalability – a fully meshed system increases the amount of network communication required by the square of the number of nodes.
  • Inbuilt security and cryptography takes a very long time to process, so the system is not capable of agreeing transactions speedily – it can only process a handful of transactions a second, and can take hours if not days to confirm a Bitcoin transaction for example
  • In addition this adds costs – the hashing calculations are extremely energy intensive, calculations at the moment are that it costs in the order of $1000 to process a Bitcoin, and there are 12.5 per block, so it’s c $12,500 per block. So a “block” of about 2,500 transactions (that’s the Bitcoin size) means about $0.50 (50 cents) per transaction. Compare that to fractions of a cent for a typical financial transaction today.
  • Bitcoin transactions are very simple and have a low data requirement. However, the more data required per transaction (say a smart contract) the fewer transactions possible per block (a Bitcoin block for example has a 1 Mb limit) and up goes the price per transaction. In addition if data has to changed up goes the processing load.
  • It’s still not fully secure – Cryptocurrency Blockchains can be (and have been) hacked by exploitable flaws in the data stored in transactions, and by rogue actors on the inside.

In summary

So in essence blockchain technology (as designed today) is great if you want:

  • highly secure,
  • highly resilient technology
  • no trusted 3rd party.

But, for blockchain to work it also needs transactions to be:

  • relatively low volume (c 6 a second)
  • not particularly time sensitive (hours, or even days to complete)
  • relatively high transaction value to mitigate the blockchain operating costs.

In addition you have to value the distributed/low trust required feature of the system, as if you don’t need it then it’s a very high overhead, with transaction costs  several order of magnitude higher vs. other existing approaches.

Worryingly, we see a lot of mooted applications in the press where it is clear there is not a hope in hell that Blockchains (in their current form), will be fast enough or cheap enough to work (see Dinis’s talk on IoT – linked to above – for a typical example). Somewhere between the hype, hope and heuristics is a major disconnect. In our view a lot of applications currently being suggested for blockhain at the moment won’t be able to cope with its operational and economic overheads.

Now as it happens (and fortunately for our client), some key Professional Services applications do fit the requirements of this profile, so it is worth them looking at blockchain technologies for applications in their businesses. So good news then.

But, even so, one should always compare the blockchain options to the existing, cheaper “Good Enoughs” around today.  Also, keep in mind Dinis’s thesis for the evolution of IoT blockchains, which may also occur in Professional Services, i.e. there will also be a huge temptation to employ more scalable/lower cost/faster performance blockchain system designs with:

  • Less distributed architecture to scale it for speed and cost
  • Less complex security in the blockchain to reduce the processing load time and cost

But this, in Dinis’ view, will probably be partly done by implementing them as “private and less distributed” systems behind IT datacentre security walls.

Note that in this case the owner of such a “Walled Garden” blockchain will very probably put themselves in the position of the “Trusted 3rd Party” supplier and, as Dinis noted for IoT blockchains:

…there will be a “race” in each industry segment (and maybe across them) as major players vie to be the Industry champion in their segment, and let network effects drive them to dominance. This will of course give these players major control, information asymmetry, and the ability to price as they see fit.

This is not unlike most network businesses’ evolution – telecoms, electronic payments processing, internet, social networks etc. where initially players try to build “walled garden” services to maximise their revenues, and only after a long time does it commoditise, eventually, into a regulated utility.

Share this:

  • Tweet

Filed Under: blockchain

Next Page »

Sign up for our regular Agile Elephant Newsletter - news, posts, ideas and more.

My Tweets

From the Agile Elephant Blog

  • The Metaverse doesn’t exist yet, but…
  • Impossible Things get Disruptive
  • Clarity, Cloud, and Culture Change at IBM

What Next?
Take a look around our site, check out our approach, see how we can help, join the conversation on our blog or contact us to find out more.

About Us

Agile Elephant is a new kind of consultancy designed to help companies embrace the new digital culture of social collaboration, sharing and openness that is changing business models and the world of work.

Contact us to find out more!

Our founder's blogs:

broadstuff

@DT on Medium

Technotropolis

Our blog:

The Agile Elephant Blog

Site Log In | Site Log Out

Subscribe to Site RSS

Subscribe to our Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe

Copyright © 2025 ·Streamline Pro Theme · Genesis Framework by StudioPress · WordPress · Log in